Record and Reward Federated Learning Contributions with Blockchain
Abstract
Although Federated Learning allows for participants to contribute their local data without it being revealed, it faces issues in data security and in accurately paying participants for quality data contributions. In this paper, we propose an EOS Blockchain design and workflow to establish data security, a novel validation error based metric upon which we qualify gradient uploads for payment, and implement a small example of our blockchain Federated Learning model to analyze its performance.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 15 · Cited by 92
- Authors
- Martinez, I., Francis, S., & Hafid, A. S.
- Affiliations
- Université de Montréal (CA)
- Venue
- 2019 International Conference on Cyber-Enabled Distributed Computing and Knowledge Discovery (CyberC)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2019-10
- Pages
- 50-57
- OpenAlex
- W2998460075
- Cited by
- 92
- References
- 15
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 5
- FWCI
- 7.57
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- International Conference on Cyber-Enabled Distributed Computing and Knowledge Discovery (CyberC) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology in Education and Learning
- Keywords
- federated learning, blockchain, data security, reward processing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review