Cited by 7

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Feature Selection for Document Flow Segmentation

Hamdi, Ahmed, Coustaty, Mickael, Joseph, Aurelie, d'Andecy, Vincent Poulain, Doucet, Antoine, Ogier, Jean-Marc·2018·2018 13th IAPR International Workshop on Document Analysis Systems (DAS)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/das.2018.66

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

Cited by 7

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. kanerva, 2000, Random indexing of text samples for latent semantic analysis, Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Society, 1
  2. 10.1109/DAS.2016.21 · DOI · Paper page
  3. kumar, 2012, Learning document structure for retrieval and classification, Pattern Recognition (ICPR) 2012 21st International Conference on, 1558
  4. lewis, 1994, A comparison of two learning algorithms for text categorization, Third Annual Symposium on Document Analysis and Information Retrieval, 33, 81
  5. 10.1007/s10032-014-0225-8 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1109/ICDAR.2003.1227795 · DOI
  7. shin, 2001, Classification of document pages using structure-based features, International Journal on Document Analysis and Recognition, 3, 232, 10.1007/PL00013566 · DOI
  8. yang, 2009, Extended vsm for xml document classification using frequent subtrees, Proc 5th Int Workshop Initiative Evaluation XML Retrieval, 441
  9. 10.1145/312624.312647 · DOI
  10. yang, 1997, A comparative study on feature selection in text categorization, ICML, 97, 412
  11. 10.1109/ICDAR.1995.601965 · DOI
  12. 10.1109/ICDAR.1993.395776 · DOI
  13. gordo, 2010, A bag-of-pages approach to unordered multipage document classification, Pattern Recognition (ICPR), 1920
  14. 10.1007/s11554-011-0227-4 · DOI
  15. 10.1142/S0218213094000121 · DOI
  16. 10.1109/TAI.1993.633991 · DOI
  17. collins-thompson, 2002, A clustering-based algorithm for automatic document separation, SIGIR 2002 Workshop on Information Retrieval and OCR From Converting Content to Grasping Meaning Tampere Finland
  18. belaid, 2013, Handwritten and Printed Text Separation in Real Document
  19. 10.1109/ICPR.1998.711385 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Hamdi, A., Coustaty, M., Joseph, A., d'Andecy, V. P., Doucet, A., & Ogier, J.-M.
Venue
2018 13th IAPR International Workshop on Document Analysis Systems (DAS)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2018-04
Pages
245-250
Cited by
7

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Feature Selection for Document Flow Segmentation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/das.2018.66
The paper
Hamdi, A., Coustaty, M., Joseph, A., d'Andecy, V. P., Doucet, A., & Ogier, J.-M. (2018). Feature Selection for Document Flow Segmentation. 2018 13th IAPR International Workshop on Document Analysis Systems (DAS). https://doi.org/10.1109/das.2018.66