The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effects of transparency on pilot trust and agreement in the autonomous constrained flight planner
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“high transparency may create a level of complacency that leads to less vigilance in overseeing or questioning the autonomous agent’s work (Sadler et al., 2016).”
From Human–Autonomy Teaming: A Review and Analysis of the Empirical Literature (2022) · cites this paper as Sadler et al., 2016
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Trust in Automation: Designing for Appropriate Reliance
Lee, J. D., & See, K. A. (2004) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1518/hfes.46.1.50_30392 · Cited by 6,605 · cited 5×
“A. Information Seeking The Baseline conditions showed no trends associated with Risk, with pilots verifying 61%-65% of the time, and exploring 73%-74% of the time.”
BackgroundInfluentialHumans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse, abuse
Parasuraman, R., & Riley, V. (1997) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1518/001872097778543886 · Cited by 4,554
A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation
Parasuraman, R., Sheridan, T. B., & Wickens, C. D. (2000) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans · doi:10.1109/3468.844354 · Cited by 4,195 · cited 1×
“Using this transparency decomposition, systems can be designed to encourage human-automation teaming and a fitting division of labor [9] between the system and user.”
MethodTrust in Automation: Integrating Empirical Evidence on Factors That Influence Trust
Hoff, K. A., & Bashir, M. (2015) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/0018720814547570 · Cited by 2,817
The effects of transparency on trust in and acceptance of a content-based art recommender
Cramer, H., Evers, V., Ramlal, S., van Someren, M., Rutledge, L., Stash, N., Aroyo, L., & Wielinga, B. (2008) · User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction · doi:10.1007/s11257-008-9051-3 · Cited by 448
Intelligent agent transparency in human–agent teaming for multi-UxV management
Mercado, J. E., Rupp, M. A., Chen, J. Y. C., Barnes, M. J., Barber, D., & Procci, K. (2016) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/0018720815621206 · Cited by 403
Research works printed but not linked: 17
- 10.21236/ADA600351 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1518/001872095779049543 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/TSMCC.2010.2056682 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0020-7373(87)80013-5 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0018720812443825 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/1064804615611272 · DOI · Paper page
- lyons, 2016, Shaping trust through transparent design: theoretical and experimental guidelines, Conf Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics
- 10.1007/978-3-319-20373-7_40 · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-20373-7_40
- 10.1177/0018720811427034 · DOI
- 10.1518/hfes.46.1.50.30392 · doi:10.1518/hfes.46.1.50.30392 · Paper page
- lyons, 2013, 2013 Assoc for the Advancement of Artificial Intell Spring Symp, 48
- 10.1109/THMS.2013.2293535 · DOI · Paper page
- 0, Nat. Aeronautics and Space Admin. (2015, December 1), Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) Traffic Management (UTM)
- 10.2514/6.2016-1002 · DOI
- meuleau, 2009, Emergency landing planner for damaged aircraft, Proc 21st Innovative Applicat of Artificial Intell Conf, 114
- 10.1109/SMC.2014.6974381 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.846 · doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.846
Cited by
Human–Autonomy Teaming: A Review and Analysis of the Empirical Literature
O’Neill, T., McNeese, N., Barron, A., & Schelble, B. (2022) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/0018720820960865 · Cited by 695
Zhang, R., Duan, W., Flathmann, C., McNeese, N., Freeman, G., & Williams, A. (2023) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3610072 · Cited by 134
Calibrating Reliance on Automated Advice: Transparency and Trust Calibration Feedback
Tatasciore, M., & Loft, S. (2025) · International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2025.2487861 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Sadler, G., Battiste, H., Ho, N., Hoffmann, L., Johnson, W., Shively, R., Lyons, J., & Smith, D.
- Venue
- 2016 IEEE/AIAA 35th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2016-09
- Pages
- 1-9
- Cited by
- 34
- References
- 6
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of transparency on pilot trust and agreement in the autonomous constrained flight planner. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/dasc.2016.7777998
- The paper
- Sadler, G., Battiste, H., Ho, N., Hoffmann, L., Johnson, W., Shively, R., Lyons, J., & Smith, D. (2016). Effects of transparency on pilot trust and agreement in the autonomous constrained flight planner. 2016 IEEE/AIAA 35th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC). https://doi.org/10.1109/dasc.2016.7777998
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
