Cited by 10Face recognition and analysisEmotion and Mood RecognitionFace and Expression Recognition

Intensity measurement of spontaneous facial actions: Evaluation of different image representations

Zaker, Nazanin, Mahoor, Mohammad H., Mattson, Whitney I., Messinger, Daniel S., Cohn, Jeffrey F.·2012·2012 IEEE International Conference on Development and Learning and Epigenetic Robotics (ICDL)

Abstract

Intensity measurements of infant facial expressions are central to understand emotion-mediated interactions and emotional development. We evaluate alternative image representations for automatic measurement of the intensity of spontaneous facial Action Units (AUs) related to infant emotion expression. Twelve infants were video-recorded during face-to-face interactions with their mothers. Facial features were tracked using active appearance models (AAMs) and registered to a canonical view. Three feature representations were compared: shape and grey scale texture, Histogram of Oriented Gradients (HOG), and Local Binary Pattern Histograms (LBPH). To reduce the high dimensionality of the appearance features (grey scale texture, HOG, and LBPH), a non-linear algorithm was used (Laplacian Eigenmaps). For each representation, support vector machine classifiers were used to learn six gradations of AU intensity (0 to maximal). The target AUs were those central to positive and negative infant emotion. Shape plus grey scale texture performed best for AUs that involve non-rigid deformations of permanent facial features (e.g., AU 12 and AU 20). These findings suggest that AU intensity detection may be maximized by choosing feature representations best suited for specific AU.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/devlrn.2012.6400846

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 13 · Cited by 10

Authors
Zaker, N., Mahoor, M. H., Mattson, W. I., Messinger, D. S., & Cohn, J. F.
Affiliations
  • University of Denver (US)
  • University of Miami (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
Venue
2012 IEEE International Conference on Development and Learning and Epigenetic Robotics (ICDL)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2012-11
Pages
1-2
OpenAlex
W2537374052
Cited by
10
References
13
Citations by year
2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3
FWCI
2.04
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE International Conference on Development and Learning (ICDL) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face and Expression Recognition
Keywords
facial action units, infant facial expressions, histogram of oriented gradients, local binary pattern histogram, shape features, Laplacian eigenmaps, support vector machine classification, mother-infant interaction, emotional development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review