Cited by 15Robot Manipulation and LearningTeleoperation and Haptic SystemsTactile and Sensory Interactions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Correcting pose estimates during tactile exploration of object shape: a neuro-robotic study

Strub, Claudius, Worgotter, Florentin, Ritter, Helge, Sandamirskaya, Yulia·2014·4th International Conference on Development and Learning and on Epigenetic Robotics

Abstract

Robots are expected to operate autonomously in unconstrained, real-world environments. Therefore, they cannot rely on access to models of all objects in their environment, in order to parameterize object-directed actions. The robot must estimate the shape of objects in such environments, based on their perception. How to estimate an object's shape based on distal sensors, such as color- or depth cameras, has been extensively studied. Using haptic sensors for this purpose, however, has not been considered in a comparable depth. Humans, to the contrary, are able to improve object manipulation capabilities by using tactile stimuli, acquired from an active haptic exploration of an object. In this paper we introduce a neural-dynamic model which allows to build an object shape representation based on haptic exploration. Acquiring this representation during object manipulation requires the robot to autonomously detect and correct errors in the localization of tactile features with respect to the object. We have implemented an architecture for haptic exploration of an object's shape on a physical robotic hand in a simple exemplary scenario, in which the geometrical models of two different n-gons are learned from tactile data while rotating them with the robotic hand.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/devlrn.2014.6982950

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. 10.1007/s00422-012-0484-8 · DOI
  2. 10.1111/1467-7687.00295 · DOI
  3. sandamirskaya, 2013, Dynamic neural fields as a step towards cognitive neuromorphic architectures, Frontiers in Neuroscience, 7, 276
  4. claudius, 2014, Using haptics to extract object shape from rotational manipulations, Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) IEEE/RSJ International Conference On IEEE
  5. 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2013.01.002 · DOI
  6. 10.1007/BF00288786 · DOI
  7. platt, 2011, Simultaneous localization and grasping using belief space planning, Robotics and Automation (ICRA) IEEE International Conference On Workshop on Manipulation under Uncertainty
  8. 10.1109/IROS.2011.6094932 · DOI
  9. 10.1109/ROBOT.2004.1307183 · DOI
  10. 10.1109/ICRA.2011.5980363 · DOI
  11. li, 2012, A biologically inspired solution to simultaneous localization and consistent mapping in dynamic environments, Neurocomputing
  12. 10.1109/TRO.2011.2120830 · DOI
  13. snow, 2013, Haptic shape processing in visual cortex, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
  14. 10.1109/IROS.2013.6696778 · DOI
  15. 10.1017/CBO9780511816772.007 · DOI
  16. 10.1109/MRA.2006.1678144 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1007/BF00337259 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.neunet.2008.03.007 · DOI
  19. 10.1109/MRA.2006.1638022 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1109/ICRA.2011.5980395 · DOI
  21. 10.3389/neuro.12.003.2007 · DOI
  22. hsiao, 2011, Neurobiology of Sensation and Reward-Chap, 7
  23. 10.1109/ICRA.2012.6224813 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Strub, C., Worgotter, F., Ritter, H., & Sandamirskaya, Y.
Affiliations
  • University of Göttingen (DE)
  • Bielefeld University (DE)
  • Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
Venue
4th International Conference on Development and Learning and on Epigenetic Robotics
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2014-10
Pages
26-33
OpenAlex
W2081250498
Cited by
15
References
1
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1
FWCI
3.23
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE International Conference on Development and Learning (ICDL) (publishedVersion)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Teleoperation and Haptic Systems
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Keywords
object shape estimation, haptic exploration, error correction, robotic hand, object manipulation, haptic sensing, robot perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review