The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Correcting pose estimates during tactile exploration of object shape: a neuro-robotic study
Abstract
Robots are expected to operate autonomously in unconstrained, real-world environments. Therefore, they cannot rely on access to models of all objects in their environment, in order to parameterize object-directed actions. The robot must estimate the shape of objects in such environments, based on their perception. How to estimate an object's shape based on distal sensors, such as color- or depth cameras, has been extensively studied. Using haptic sensors for this purpose, however, has not been considered in a comparable depth. Humans, to the contrary, are able to improve object manipulation capabilities by using tactile stimuli, acquired from an active haptic exploration of an object. In this paper we introduce a neural-dynamic model which allows to build an object shape representation based on haptic exploration. Acquiring this representation during object manipulation requires the robot to autonomously detect and correct errors in the localization of tactile features with respect to the object. We have implemented an architecture for haptic exploration of an object's shape on a physical robotic hand in a simple exemplary scenario, in which the geometrical models of two different n-gons are learned from tactile data while rotating them with the robotic hand.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Haptic SLAM can be used for tactile exploration of an object or of a scene.
“Haptic SLAM can be used for tactile exploration of an object or of a scene [237, 263].”
From Past, Present, and Future of Simultaneous Localization and Mapping: Toward the Robust-Perception Age (2016) · cites this paper as [237]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Coding and use of tactile signals from the fingertips in object manipulation tasks
Johansson, R. S., & Flanagan, J. R. (2009) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2621 · Cited by 2,063
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 23
- 10.1007/s00422-012-0484-8 · DOI
- 10.1111/1467-7687.00295 · DOI
- sandamirskaya, 2013, Dynamic neural fields as a step towards cognitive neuromorphic architectures, Frontiers in Neuroscience, 7, 276
- claudius, 2014, Using haptics to extract object shape from rotational manipulations, Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) IEEE/RSJ International Conference On IEEE
- 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2013.01.002 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00288786 · DOI
- platt, 2011, Simultaneous localization and grasping using belief space planning, Robotics and Automation (ICRA) IEEE International Conference On Workshop on Manipulation under Uncertainty
- 10.1109/IROS.2011.6094932 · DOI
- 10.1109/ROBOT.2004.1307183 · DOI
- 10.1109/ICRA.2011.5980363 · DOI
- li, 2012, A biologically inspired solution to simultaneous localization and consistent mapping in dynamic environments, Neurocomputing
- 10.1109/TRO.2011.2120830 · DOI
- snow, 2013, Haptic shape processing in visual cortex, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
- 10.1109/IROS.2013.6696778 · DOI
- 10.1017/CBO9780511816772.007 · DOI
- 10.1109/MRA.2006.1678144 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/BF00337259 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neunet.2008.03.007 · DOI
- 10.1109/MRA.2006.1638022 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/ICRA.2011.5980395 · DOI
- 10.3389/neuro.12.003.2007 · DOI
- hsiao, 2011, Neurobiology of Sensation and Reward-Chap, 7
- 10.1109/ICRA.2012.6224813 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Past, Present, and Future of Simultaneous Localization and Mapping: Toward the Robust-Perception Age
Cadena, C., Carlone, L., Carrillo, H., Latif, Y., Scaramuzza, D., Neira, J., Reid, I., & Leonard, J. J. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Robotics · doi:10.1109/tro.2016.2624754 · Cited by 3,596
Metadata
- Authors
- Strub, C., Worgotter, F., Ritter, H., & Sandamirskaya, Y.
- Affiliations
- University of Göttingen (DE)
- Bielefeld University (DE)
- Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
- Venue
- 4th International Conference on Development and Learning and on Epigenetic Robotics
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2014-10
- Pages
- 26-33
- OpenAlex
- W2081250498
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 3.23
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE International Conference on Development and Learning (ICDL) (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Teleoperation and Haptic Systems
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
- Keywords
- object shape estimation, haptic exploration, error correction, robotic hand, object manipulation, haptic sensing, robot perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review