The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Pinpoint: problem determination in large, dynamic Internet services
Abstract
Traditional problem determination techniques rely on static dependency models that are difficult to generate accurately in today's large, distributed, and dynamic application environments such as e-commerce systems. We present a dynamic analysis methodology that automates problem determination in these environments by 1) coarse-grained tagging of numerous real client requests as they travel through the system and 2) using data mining techniques to correlate the believed failures and successes of these requests to determine which components are most likely to be at fault. To validate our methodology, we have implemented Pinpoint, a framework for root cause analysis on the J2EE platform that requires no knowledge of the application components. Pinpoint consists of three parts: a communications layer that traces client requests, a failure detector that uses traffic-sniffing and middleware instrumentation, and a data analysis engine. We evaluate Pinpoint by injecting faults into various application components and show that Pinpoint identifies the faulty components with high accuracy and produces few false-positives.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Detecting large-scale system problems by mining console logs
Xu, W., Huang, L., Fox, A., Patterson, D., & Jordan, M. I. (2009) · Proceedings of the ACM SIGOPS 22nd symposium on Operating systems principles · doi:10.1145/1629575.1629587 · Cited by 1,332
Self-citationBoutaba, R., Salahuddin, M. A., Limam, N., Ayoubi, S., Shahriar, N., Estrada-Solano, F., & Caicedo, O. M. (2018) · Journal of Internet Services and Applications · doi:10.1186/s13174-018-0087-2 · Cited by 1,036
A theoretical analysis of the risk evaluation formulas for spectrum-based fault localization
Xie, X., Chen, T. Y., Kuo, F.-C., & Xu, B. (2013) · ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology · doi:10.1145/2522920.2522924 · Cited by 353
MicroRCA: Root Cause Localization of Performance Issues in Microservices
Wu, L., Tordsson, J., Elmroth, E., & Kao, O. (2020) · NOMS 2020 - 2020 IEEE/IFIP Network Operations and Management Symposium · doi:10.1109/noms47738.2020.9110353 · Cited by 265
(2015) · doi:10.1145/2815400.2815415 · Cited by 202
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, M. Y., Kiciman, E., Fratkin, E., Fox, A., & Brewer, E.
- Venue
- Proceedings International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks
- Publisher
- IEEE Comput. Soc
- Published
- 2003-06-25
- Pages
- 595-604
- OpenAlex
- W2143522309
- Cited by
- 835
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.81
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pinpoint: problem determination in large, dynamic Internet services. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/dsn.2002.1029005
- The paper
- Chen, M. Y., Kiciman, E., Fratkin, E., Fox, A., & Brewer, E. (2003). Pinpoint: problem determination in large, dynamic Internet services. Proceedings International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks. https://doi.org/10.1109/dsn.2002.1029005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.