Consistent sparsification for graph optimization
Abstract
In a standard pose-graph formulation of simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM), due to the continuously increasing numbers of nodes (states) and edges (measurements), the graph may grow prohibitively too large for long-term navigation. This motivates us to systematically reduce the pose graph amenable to available processing and memory resources. In particular, in this paper we introduce a consistent graph sparsification scheme: (i) sparsifying nodes via marginalization of old nodes, while retaining all the information (consistent relative constraints) - which is conveyed in the discarded measurements - about the remaining nodes after marginalization; and (ii) sparsifying edges by formulating and solving a consistent ℓ1-regularized minimization problem, which automatically promotes the sparsity of the graph. The proposed approach is validated on both synthetic and real data.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Huang et al. sparsify the Hessian matrix by solving an l1-regularized minimization problem.
“Huang et al. [107] sparsify the Hessian matrix (arising in the normal equations) by solving an ℓ 1 -regularized minimization problem.”
From Past, Present, and Future of Simultaneous Localization and Mapping: Toward the Robust-Perception Age (2016) · cites this paper as [107]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Parallel Tracking and Mapping for Small AR Workspaces
Klein, G., & Murray, D. (2007) · 2007 6th IEEE and ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality · doi:10.1109/ismar.2007.4538852 · Cited by 4,346 · see citing works
Bundle Adjustment — A Modern Synthesis
Triggs, B., McLauchlan, P. F., Hartley, R. I., & Fitzgibbon, A. W. (2000) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-44480-7_21 · Cited by 3,988 · see citing works
iSAM2: Incremental smoothing and mapping using the Bayes tree
Kaess, M., Johannsson, H., Roberts, R., Ila, V., Leonard, J. J., & Dellaert, F. (2012) · The International Journal of Robotics Research · doi:10.1177/0278364911430419 · Cited by 1,362 · see citing works
Self-citationStrasdat, H., Montiel, J. M. M., & Davison, A. J. (2012) · Image and Vision Computing · doi:10.1016/j.imavis.2012.02.009 · Cited by 439 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Graph-based batch optimization methods for SLAM recently have prevailed (e.g., [1], [3], [4], [17]–[23]).”
MethodFast iterative alignment of pose graphs with poor initial estimates
Olson, E., Leonard, J., & Teller, S. (2006) · Proceedings 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2006. ICRA 2006. · doi:10.1109/robot.2006.1642040 · Cited by 427 · see citing works
Self-citationNonlinear Constraint Network Optimization for Efficient Map Learning
Grisetti, G., Stachniss, C., & Burgard, W. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/tits.2009.2026444 · Cited by 222 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Past, Present, and Future of Simultaneous Localization and Mapping: Toward the Robust-Perception Age
Cadena, C., Carlone, L., Carrillo, H., Latif, Y., Scaramuzza, D., Neira, J., Reid, I., & Leonard, J. J. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Robotics · doi:10.1109/tro.2016.2624754 · Cited by 3,596 · see citing works
Self-citationCommunication-constrained multi-AUV cooperative SLAM
Paull, L., Huang, G., Seto, M., & Leonard, J. J. (2015) · 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) · doi:10.1109/icra.2015.7139227 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Huang, G., Kaess, M., & Leonard, J. J.
- Affiliations
- MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (US)
- Venue
- 2013 European Conference on Mobile Robots
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2013-09
- Pages
- 150-157
- OpenAlex
- W2033923716
- Cited by
- 70
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 15.89
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- European Conference on Mobile Robots (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Target Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Robotic Path Planning Algorithms
- Keywords
- graph sparsification, pose graph, SLAM, graph optimization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review