Cited by 147IoT and Edge/Fog ComputingCaching and Content DeliveryCloud Computing and Remote Desktop Technologies

Impact of cloudlets on interactive mobile cloud applications

Fesehaye, Debessay, Gao, Yunlong, Nahrstedt, Klara, Wang, Guijun·2012·2012 IEEE 16th International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference

Abstract

In this paper we analyze and study the impact of cloudlets in interactive mobile cloud applications. To study the impact we propose the design of cloudlet network and service architectures. Our study focuses on file editing, video streaming and collaborative chatting which are representative enterprise application scenarios. Initial simulation results show the performance gains of using cloudlets over using clouds in terms of data transfer delay and system throughput. When not more than two cloudlet wireless hops are used to transfer data, the cloudlet-based approach outperforms the cloud-based approach for all three application scenarios. With more cloudlet wireless hops under mobility, the cloud-based approach can give a better performance for some of the data transfers even though the cloudlet-based can outperform the cloud-based approach for most of the flows. In such scenarios, we suggest that an adaptive scheme should be used. For example, a scheme making an intelligent decision on either the cloudlet network or the cloud network, whichever gives minimum delay, can be used.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/edoc.2012.23

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The cloudlet model suffers performance degradation if too many intermediary hops between the mobile user and the cloudlet target are required.

    “Nevertheless, the cloudlet model has been shown to suffer performance degradation if too many intermediary steps (“hops”), where bandwidth was reduced) were required between the mobile user and the cloudlet target in a simulation study [142].”

    From Edge AI: A survey (2023) · cites this paper as [142]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fesehaye, D., Gao, Y., Nahrstedt, K., & Wang, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
  • Boeing (United States) (US)
Venue
2012 IEEE 16th International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2012-09
Pages
123-132
ISSN
1541-7719 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1984200271
Cited by
147
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 1
FWCI
13.95
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (EDOC) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Caching and Content Delivery
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Cloud Computing and Remote Desktop Technologies
Keywords
cloudlets, mobile cloud computing, interactive mobile application, cloud services, data transfer delay, throughput, video streaming, file editing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review