The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Integrating Predictive Analytics into Complex Event Processing by Using Conditional Density Estimations
Abstract
The monitoring of real-time objects such as steel billets during their casting process creates myriads of events. Complex Event Processing (CEP) is the technology to analyze resulting event streams as fast as possible. But classic CEP is not able to consider events that did not happen yet. It is not clear how to transform CEP from a technology, which reacts on past events, to one, which anticipates near future events. Conditional density estimation allows to combine both estimation and expected uncertainty about the next occurrence of a given event in one mathematical object. Moreover, it allows to calculate the probability of event patterns, which are the basis for CEP. Hence, we are introducing the concept of Conditional Event Occurrence Density Estimation (CEODE) to CEP. We present a reference architecture for combining CEP engines with predictive analytics using CEODEs. On basis of concrete guidelines for transforming classical event processing rules to proactive ones, we are demonstrating how CEP evolves from being reactive to becoming both predictive and prescriptive.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Still, there is very limited work on how to integrate the probabilistic results pertaining to event predictions within CEP systems (Christ, Krumeich, & Kempa-Liehr, 2016).”
From Prescriptive analytics: Literature review and research challenges (2020) · cites this paper as Christ, Krumeich, & Kempa-Liehr, 2016
Citations
Cites
Multivariate Density Estimation: Theory, Practice, and Visualization
Scott, D. W. (2015) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/9781118575574 · Cited by 1,165
Research works printed but not linked: 24
- 10.1145/359545.359563 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.aaa8415 · DOI · Paper page
- schwegmann, 2013, A Method and Tool for Predictive Event-Driven Process Analytics, AIS Electronic Library Paper, 46
- 10.1145/2371316.2371323 · DOI
- 10.1186/s40537-015-0017-0 · DOI
- heinz, 2006, Towards Kernel Density Estimation over Streaming Data, COMAD, 80
- cao, 2012, SOMKE: Kernel Density Estimation Over Data Streams by Sequences of Self-Organizing Maps, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 23, 1254, 10.1109/TNNLS.2012.2201167 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-319-06695-0_4 · DOI
- kim, 2012, A Case Study on Modeling of Complex Event Processing in Enterprise Architecture, Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (ICEIS 2012), 173
- 10.1145/2002259.2002279 · DOI
- 10.1109/Trustcom.2015.590 · DOI
- luckham, 2002, The Power of Events An Introduction to Complex Event Processing in Distributed Enterprise Systems
- 10.1108/BPMJ-07-2013-0092 · DOI
- christ, 2016, Time series analysis in industrial applications, Workshop on Extreme Value and Time Series Analysis
- feindt, 2004, A neural Bayesian estimator for conditional probability densities, Arxiv Preprint Physics/0004057 · arXiv
- 10.1002/9781119198697 · DOI
- 10.1145/2611286.2611289 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-642-02439-9 · DOI
- etzion, 2010, Event Processing in Action, 325
- 10.1007/978-3-540-72035-5_3 · DOI
- 10.1145/2488222.2488274 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-319-10172-9_31 · DOI
- redlich, 2011, Event-driven process-centric performance prediction via simulation, Business Process Management Workshops, 473
- fournier, 2015, Extending Event-Driven Architecture for Proactive Systems, presented at the EDBT
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Prescriptive analytics: Literature review and research challenges
Lepenioti, K., Bousdekis, A., Apostolou, D., & Mentzas, G. (2020) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.04.003 · Cited by 501
“CEP tracks and processes streams of information (data) about things that happen (events) by combining multiple sources with the aim to infer events or patterns that reveal meaningful events, such as opportunities or threats, and to react to them (Bates, 2012; Etzion, Niblett, & Luckham, 2011; Luckham, 2011; Schmerken,…”
InfluentialSensor data quality: a systematic review
Teh, H. Y., Kempa-Liehr, A. W., & Wang, K. I.-K. (2020) · Journal of Big Data · doi:10.1186/s40537-020-0285-1 · Cited by 377
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Christ, M., Krumeich, J., & Kempa-Liehr, A. W.
- Affiliations
- Saarland University (DE)
- University of Freiburg (DE)
- Venue
- 2016 IEEE 20th International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Workshop (EDOCW)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2016-09
- Pages
- 1-8
- OpenAlex
- W2529611981
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 1.71
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference Workshops (EDOCW) (publishedVersion)
- ResearchSpace (University of Auckland) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Advanced Database Systems and Queries
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Data Mining Algorithms and Applications
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Business Process Modeling and Analysis
- Keywords
- complex event processing, predictive analytics, conditional density estimation, event streams, prescriptive analytics, real-time monitoring
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review