The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
GenAI-Driven Game and Viva Assessments for Software Engineering
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
Learning without Limits: Analysing the Usage of Generative AI in a Summative Assessment
Clift, L., & Petrovska, O. (2024) · Conference on Computing Education Practice (CEP) · doi:10.1145/3702212.3702214 · Cited by 9
Supporting Brainstorming Activities with Bots in Software Engineering Education
Farah, J. C., Scala, J. L., Ingram, S., & Gillet, D. (2025) · IEEE/ACM International Workshop on Bots in Software Engineering (BotSE) · doi:10.1109/botse67031.2025.00013 · Cited by 6
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Hayashi, 2024, ChatGPT for Self-Reflection in Software Engineering
- Jackson, 2025, Exploring GenAI in Software Development
- Johri, 2025, Lessons for GenAI Literacy in Workplace Learning
- Mellqvist, 2024, Exploring Student Perspectives on GenAI in SE
- Namiot, 2025, On the Architecture of LLM Agents in SE
- Pulikal, 2024, A Paradigm Shift in Educational Content Creation
- Ramanan, 2024, ASPIRE: AI for Code Analysis and Repair
- Wang, 2024, Assessing UML Models Using ChatGPT
Cited by
Still being checked.
Metadata
- Authors
- Datta, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Houston (US)
- Corresponding author
- Datta, Soma
- ORCID
- Datta, Soma
- Venue
- 2026 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2026-04-27
- Pages
- 1-3
- OpenAlex
- W7166544403
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Games and Gamification
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Teaching and Learning Programming
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology and Assessment
- Keywords
- generative AI, game-based assessment, software engineering education, automated assessment, AI-assisted learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: GenAI-Driven Game and Viva Assessments for Software Engineering. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/educon67543.2026.11574097
- The paper
- Datta, S. (2026). GenAI-Driven Game and Viva Assessments for Software Engineering. 2026 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON). https://doi.org/10.1109/educon67543.2026.11574097
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
