The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Design and Implementation of an Edge-Computing-Based Faulty Gateway Recovery Scheme for ZigBee Networks
Abstract
This paper focuses on the network-interruption problem caused by single-point-of-failure of the gateway in ZigBee smart-home networks and proposes an edge-computing-based self-healing scheme for faulty gateways. By establishing a three-level device hierarchy-Class-0 (core gateway), Class-1 (backup gateway) and Class-2 (terminal devices)-and exploiting Class-1 devices equipped with concurrent ZigBee + Wi-Fi radios as distributed redundant nodes, the scheme introduces an edge-side multi-dimensional device evaluation model (M-score). A machine-learning algorithm fuses signal quality, network-topology position and device stability to intelligently select the optimal backup node. When the master gateway fails, the system triggers a fast-reaction mechanism driven by routing-packet density (F-score); the top-ranked Class-1 device automatically performs Wi-Fi association, downloads its configuration from the cloud and rebuilds the ZigBee network, accomplishing gateway replacement without human intervention. Experimental results show that the scheme reduces the Mean Time To Repair (MTTR) from over an hour in traditional solutions to under 15 minutes with a $\mathbf{1 0 0} {\%}$ success rate, markedly improving smart-home network reliability and user experience. These gains stem from optimizing the key maintainability metric MTTR and from the effective implementation of the self-healing mechanism, all achieved without extra hardware cost and deployable at scale through firmware upgrades alone.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“hardware-level recovery takes minutes [29]”
From Digital Twins at the Edge: A High-Availability Framework for Resilient Data Processing in IoT Sensor Networks (2026) · cites this paper as [29]
In the citing paper
“whereas platforms such as StarlingX [12], IoT recovery frameworks [11], and ZigBee [29] self-healing mechanisms report results from deployed or hardware-based implementa- tions.”
From Digital Twins at the Edge: A High-Availability Framework for Resilient Data Processing in IoT Sensor Networks (2026) · cites this paper as [29]
Citations
Cites
Architecting Software for the Internet of Thing Based Systems
Alreshidi, A., & Ahmad, A. (2019) · Future Internet · doi:10.3390/fi11070153 · Cited by 36
Caleb, S., & Thangaraj, S. J. J. (2025) · Signal Image and Video Processing · doi:10.1007/s11760-025-04338-7 · Cited by 8
Energy efficient low latency three-layer framework for task offloading in edge-fog-cloud environment
Tabassum, A., Hossen, M., & Fahim, I. A. (2025) · International Journal of Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s41870-025-02773-w · Cited by 4
Application Research of Wireless Sensor Networks and the Internet of Things
Lv, C., Wang, R., & Zhao, M. (2025) · Journal of Electronic Research and Application · doi:10.26689/jera.v9i4.11471 · Cited by 2
Zhao, Y. (2023) · Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences · doi:10.2478/amns.2023.1.00361 · Cited by 1
Duan, F., Han, B., & Bu, X. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-98486-y · Cited by 1
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- 2014, ZigBee Smart Energy Profile Specification Standard
- 2020, Patent Issued for Failover Method, Apparatus and System (USPTO 10,795,785)[J], 1395
- 2014, ZigBee Smart Energy Profile Specification Standard
Cited by
Neagu, M., Serban, C. M., Hangan, A., & Sebestyen, G. (2026) · Future Internet · doi:10.3390/fi18030137 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, T., Tian, L., Huang, G., & Li, A.
- Affiliations
- Guangdong University of Science and Technology (CN)
- ORCID
- Li, Tingting
- Venue
- 2025 7th International Conference on Electronic Engineering and Informatics (EEI)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2025-11-07
- Pages
- 670-674
- OpenAlex
- W7125605905
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1
- FWCI
- 1.24
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Conference on Electronic Engineering and Informatics (EEI) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Wireless Sensor Networks and IoT
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Energy Efficient Wireless Sensor Networks
- Keywords
- edge computing, ZigBee wireless network, network fault tolerance, wireless sensor networks
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.