Cited by 28Obstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchNon-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control

Automated prediction of the apnea-hypopnea index using a wireless patch sensor

Selvaraj, Nandakumar, Narasimhan, Ravi·2014·2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society

Abstract

Polysomnography (PSG) is the gold standard that manually quantifies the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) to assess the severity of sleep apnea syndrome (SAS). This study presents an algorithm that automatically estimates the AHI value using a disposable HealthPatch(TM) sensor. Volunteers (n=53, AHI: 0.1-85.8) participated in an overnight PSG study with patch sensors attached to their chest at three specified locations and data were wirelessly acquired. Features were computed for 150-second epochs of patch sensor data using analyses of heart rate variability, respiratory signals, posture and movements. Linear Support Vector Machine classifier was trained to detect the presence/absence of apnea/hypopnea events for each epoch. The number of epochs identified with events was subsequently mapped to AHI values using quadratic regression analysis. The classifier and regression models were optimized to minimize the mean-square error of AHI based on leave-one-out cross-validation. Comparison of predicted and reference AHI values resulted in linear correlation coefficients of 0.87, 0.88 and 0.92 for the three locations, respectively. The predicted AHI values were subsequently used to classify the control-to-mild apnea group (AHI<;15) and moderate-to-severe apnea (AHI≥15) with an accuracy (95% confidence intervals) of 89.4% (77.4-95.4%), 85.0% (70.9-92.9%), and 82.9% (67.3-91.9%) for the three locations, respectively. Overnight physiological monitoring using a wireless patch sensor provides an accurate estimate of AHI.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/embc.2014.6943981

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Selvaraj, N., & Narasimhan, R.
Affiliations
VitalConnect (United States) (US)
Venue
2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2014-08
Volume
2014
Pages
1897-1900
ISSN
2375-7477 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2017458717
Cited by
28
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2
FWCI
9.71
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Keywords
apnea-hypopnea index, sleep apnea, apnea detection, heart rate variability, respiratory signals, support vector machine, quadratic regression, sleep apnea severity classification, polysomnography alternative
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Algorithms, Automation, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Regression Analysis, Sleep Apnea Syndromes, Polysomnography, Young Adult, Wireless Technology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review