The predictive power of structural MRI in Autism diagnosis
Abstract
Diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) using structural magnetic resonance imaging (sMRI) of the brain has been a topic of significant research interest. Previous studies using small datasets with well-matched Typically Developing Controls (TDC) report high classification accuracies (80-96%) but studies using the large heterogeneous ABIDE dataset report accuracies less than 60%. In this study we investigate the predictive power of sMRI in ASD using 373 ASD and 361 TDC male subjects from the ABIDE. Brain morphometric features were derived using FreeSurfer and classification was performed using three different techniques: Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM). Although high classification accuracies were possible in individual sites (with a maximum of 97% in Caltech), the highest classification accuracy across all sites was only 60% (sensitivity = 57%, specificity = 64%). However, the accuracy across all sites improved to 67% when IQ and age information were added to morphometric features. Across all three classifiers, volume and surface area had more discriminative power. In general, important features for classification were present in the frontal and temporal regions and these regions have been implicated in ASD. This study also explores the effect of demographics and behavioral measures on the predictive power of sMRI. Results show that classification accuracy increases with autism severity and that ASD detection with sMRI is easier before the age of 10 years.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Large-sample studies collectively demonstrate performance accuracy from 59% to 70% when testing untrained data.
“Collectively, these large-sample studies demonstrate performance accuracy from 59% to 70% when testing untrained data 65–68,94.”
From Subtyping cognitive profiles in Autism Spectrum Disorder using a Functional Random Forest algorithm (2018) · cites this paper as [94]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Heterogeneity Problem: Approaches to Identify Psychiatric Subtypes
Feczko, E., Miranda-Dominguez, O., Marr, M., Graham, A. M., Nigg, J. T., & Fair, D. A. (2019) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2019.03.009 · Cited by 443 · see citing works
Subtyping cognitive profiles in Autism Spectrum Disorder using a Functional Random Forest algorithm
Feczko, E., Balba, N. M., Miranda-Dominguez, O., Cordova, M., Karalunas, S. L., Irwin, L., Demeter, D. V., Hill, A. P., Langhorst, B. H., Grieser Painter, J., et al. (2018) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.12.044 · Cited by 173 · see citing works
Ghiassian, S., Greiner, R., Jin, P., & Brown, M. R. G. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0166934 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Multikernel Capsule Network for Schizophrenia Identification
Wang, T., Bezerianos, A., Cichocki, A., & Li, J. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/tcyb.2020.3035282 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Divide and Conquer: Sub-Grouping of ASD Improves ASD Detection Based on Brain Morphometry
Katuwal, G. J., Baum, S. A., Cahill, N. D., & Michael, A. M. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0153331 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Katuwal, G. J., Cahill, N. D., Baum, S. A., & Michael, A. M.
- Affiliations
- Rochester Institute of Technology (US)
- Venue
- 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2015-08
- Volume
- 2015
- Pages
- 4270-4273
- ISSN
- 2375-7477 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2293342147
- Cited by
- 98
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 8.89
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Keywords
- autism spectrum disorder, structural MRI, brain morphometry, ASD diagnosis, ABIDE dataset, brain volume, brain surface area, autism severity, age at diagnosis, IQ, typically developing controls, classification accuracy
- MeSH terms
- Autism Spectrum Disorder, Brain, Brain Mapping, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review