Cited by 59Gait Recognition and AnalysisBalance, Gait, and Falls PreventionContext-Aware Activity Recognition Systems

Deep Learning based Gait Abnormality Detection using Wearable Sensor System

Potluri, Sasanka, Ravuri, Srinivas, Diedrich, Christian, Schega, Lutz·2019·2019 41st Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC)

Abstract

Gait is an extraordinary complex function of human body that involves the activation of entire visceral nervous system, making human gait definite to various functional abnormalities. Diagnosis and treatment of such disorders prior to their development can be achieved through integration of modern technologies with state-of-the-art developed methods. Modern machine learning techniques have outperformed and complemented the use of conventional statistical methods in bio-medical systems. In this research a wearable sensor system is presented, which combines plantar pressure measurement unit and Inertial Measurement Units (IMU's) integrated with a stacked Long short-term memory (LSTM) model to detect human gait abnormalities that are prone to the risk of fall. The computed metrics and gait parameters show significant differences between normal and abnormal gait patterns. Three specific abnormalities involving Hemiplegic, Parkinsonian and Sensory-Ataxic gaits are simulated to validate the proposed model and show promising results. The proposed research aims to demonstrate how advanced technologies can be used in gait diagnosis and treatment assistant systems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/embc.2019.8856454

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Potluri et al. employed LSTMs to detect gait abnormalities through a wearable sensor system, with experiments on ten healthy individuals simulating specific gait abnormalities.

    “A similar work proposed by Potluri et al. [76] employed LSTMs to detect gait abnormalities through a wearable sensor system. The experiments were conducted over a set of data extracted from ten healthy individuals, such that seven behave normally, while the three remaining simulate specific gait abnormalities, i.e., sensory ataxic, Parkinson's gait, and hemiplegic gait.”

    From Gait Recognition Based on Deep Learning: A Survey (2023) · cites this paper as [76]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Potluri, S., Ravuri, S., Diedrich, C., & Schega, L.
Affiliations
Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg (DE)
Venue
2019 41st Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2019-07
Volume
2019
Pages
3613-3619
ISSN
2375-7477 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2980102731
Cited by
59
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 3
FWCI
9.86
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Gait Recognition and Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
Keywords
gait abnormality detection, wearable sensors, plantar pressure measurement, inertial measurement unit, stacked LSTM, fall risk, hemiplegic gait, parkinsonian gait, gait parameters, gait analysis
MeSH terms
Accidental Falls, Wearable Electronic Devices, Gait Analysis, Deep Learning, Humans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review