Deep Learning based Gait Abnormality Detection using Wearable Sensor System
Abstract
Gait is an extraordinary complex function of human body that involves the activation of entire visceral nervous system, making human gait definite to various functional abnormalities. Diagnosis and treatment of such disorders prior to their development can be achieved through integration of modern technologies with state-of-the-art developed methods. Modern machine learning techniques have outperformed and complemented the use of conventional statistical methods in bio-medical systems. In this research a wearable sensor system is presented, which combines plantar pressure measurement unit and Inertial Measurement Units (IMU's) integrated with a stacked Long short-term memory (LSTM) model to detect human gait abnormalities that are prone to the risk of fall. The computed metrics and gait parameters show significant differences between normal and abnormal gait patterns. Three specific abnormalities involving Hemiplegic, Parkinsonian and Sensory-Ataxic gaits are simulated to validate the proposed model and show promising results. The proposed research aims to demonstrate how advanced technologies can be used in gait diagnosis and treatment assistant systems.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Potluri et al. employed LSTMs to detect gait abnormalities through a wearable sensor system, with experiments on ten healthy individuals simulating specific gait abnormalities.
“A similar work proposed by Potluri et al. [76] employed LSTMs to detect gait abnormalities through a wearable sensor system. The experiments were conducted over a set of data extracted from ten healthy individuals, such that seven behave normally, while the three remaining simulate specific gait abnormalities, i.e., sensory ataxic, Parkinson's gait, and hemiplegic gait.”
From Gait Recognition Based on Deep Learning: A Survey (2023) · cites this paper as [76]
Cites
Mannini, A., Trojaniello, D., Cereatti, A., & Sabatini, A. (2016) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s16010134 · Cited by 242 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gait Recognition Based on Deep Learning: A Survey
Filipi Gonçalves dos Santos, C., Oliveira, D. D. S., A. Passos, L., Gonçalves Pires, R., Felipe Silva Santos, D., Pascotti Valem, L., P. Moreira, T., Cleison S. Santana, M., Roder, M., Paulo Papa, J., et al. (2023) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3490235 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
- Authors
- Potluri, S., Ravuri, S., Diedrich, C., & Schega, L.
- Affiliations
- Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg (DE)
- Venue
- 2019 41st Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2019-07
- Volume
- 2019
- Pages
- 3613-3619
- ISSN
- 2375-7477 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2980102731
- Cited by
- 59
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 3
- FWCI
- 9.86
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Gait Recognition and Analysis
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
- Keywords
- gait abnormality detection, wearable sensors, plantar pressure measurement, inertial measurement unit, stacked LSTM, fall risk, hemiplegic gait, parkinsonian gait, gait parameters, gait analysis
- MeSH terms
- Accidental Falls, Wearable Electronic Devices, Gait Analysis, Deep Learning, Humans
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review