Building robust models for Human Activity Recognition from raw accelerometers data using Gated Recurrent Units and Long Short Term Memory Neural Networks
Open accessAbstract
Human Activity Recognition (HAR) is a growing field of research in biomedical engineering and it has many potential applications in the treatment and prevention of several diseases. Due to the recent advancement in technology, devices that collect position and orientation measurements (e.g. accelerometers and gyroscopes) are becoming ubiquitous. These measurements can then be used to train machine learning models for HAR. In this research, we propose one recurrent neural network architecture and a data augmentation approach for building robust and accurate models for HAR. We compared models with Long Short Term Memory (LSTM) and Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) layers. The proposed data augmentation approach was used to make the models robust to the cases where one or more sensors are missing. In this empirical study, we could also understand some relations between the ideal locations of the sensors in the participants and the types of activities performed. The proposed approaches were tested in the GOTOv dataset from a study which involved 35 participants performing 16 sedentary, ambulatory and lifestyle activities in a semi-structured environment. The results presented, clearly show that the models are able to detect these activities in a robust way.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Previous studies have shown that LSTMs have high performance in wearable HAR.
“Previous studies have shown that LSTMs have high performance in wearable HAR [199,202,203].”
From Deep Learning in Human Activity Recognition with Wearable Sensors: A Review on Advances (2022) · cites this paper as [199]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 32 · Cited by 29
- Authors
- Okai, J., Paraschiakos, S., Beekman, M., Knobbe, A., & de Sa, C. R.
- Affiliations
- Leiden University (NL)
- Leiden University Medical Center (NL)
- Venue
- 2019 41st Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2019-07
- Volume
- 2019
- Pages
- 2486-2491
- ISSN
- 2375-7477 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2980050759
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 1.30
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- Locations
- Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- University of Twente Research Information (publishedVersion)
- Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- University of Twente Research Information (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Gait Recognition and Analysis
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
- Keywords
- human activity recognition, accelerometer data, gated recurrent unit, long short-term memory, recurrent neural networks, data augmentation, sensor placement, wearable sensors
- MeSH terms
- Activities of Daily Living, Algorithms, Computer Simulation, Humans, Neural Networks, Computer, Accelerometry
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review