Cited by 29Context-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsGait Recognition and AnalysisPhysical Activity and Health

Building robust models for Human Activity Recognition from raw accelerometers data using Gated Recurrent Units and Long Short Term Memory Neural Networks

Open access
Okai, Jeremiah, Paraschiakos, Stylianos, Beekman, Marian, Knobbe, Arno, de Sa, Claudio Rebelo·2019·2019 41st Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC)

Abstract

Human Activity Recognition (HAR) is a growing field of research in biomedical engineering and it has many potential applications in the treatment and prevention of several diseases. Due to the recent advancement in technology, devices that collect position and orientation measurements (e.g. accelerometers and gyroscopes) are becoming ubiquitous. These measurements can then be used to train machine learning models for HAR. In this research, we propose one recurrent neural network architecture and a data augmentation approach for building robust and accurate models for HAR. We compared models with Long Short Term Memory (LSTM) and Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) layers. The proposed data augmentation approach was used to make the models robust to the cases where one or more sensors are missing. In this empirical study, we could also understand some relations between the ideal locations of the sensors in the participants and the types of activities performed. The proposed approaches were tested in the GOTOv dataset from a study which involved 35 participants performing 16 sedentary, ambulatory and lifestyle activities in a semi-structured environment. The results presented, clearly show that the models are able to detect these activities in a robust way.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/embc.2019.8857288

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 32 · Cited by 29

Authors
Okai, J., Paraschiakos, S., Beekman, M., Knobbe, A., & de Sa, C. R.
Affiliations
  • Leiden University (NL)
  • Leiden University Medical Center (NL)
Venue
2019 41st Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2019-07
Volume
2019
Pages
2486-2491
ISSN
2375-7477 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2980050759
Cited by
29
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2
FWCI
1.30
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Locations
  • Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Twente Research Information (publishedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • University of Twente Research Information (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Gait Recognition and Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
Keywords
human activity recognition, accelerometer data, gated recurrent unit, long short-term memory, recurrent neural networks, data augmentation, sensor placement, wearable sensors
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Algorithms, Computer Simulation, Humans, Neural Networks, Computer, Accelerometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review