The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A novel framework for virtual recommissioning in reconfigurable manufacturing systems
Abstract
This paper defines a framework for virtual recommissioning in reconfigurable manufacturing systems. The need for virtual recommissioning arises with the multiple commissioning tasks in the life span of a reconfigurable manufacturing system. A classification of reconfiguration complexity and elementary abilities are combined in a reconfiguration matrix. The reconfiguration matrix serves as a framework for future research in virtual recommissioning. Lastly a preliminary exploration of virtual recommissioning is conducted on models of an Industry 4.0 Smart Factory demonstrator.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
DT designs and validates products in smart factories.
“designing and validating products [77,78]”
From Digital Twins in the IIoT: Current Practices and Future Directions Toward Industry 5.0 (2025) · cites this paper as [77]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 20
- shahim, 2017, Economic justification of virtual commissioning in automation industry, Proceedings of the 2016 Winter Simulation Conference
- oppelt, 2014, Automatic model generation for virtual commissioning based on plant engineering data, Preprints of the 19th World Congress The International Federation of Automatic Control
- 10.1016/j.conengprac.2012.09.022 · DOI
- 10.1109/IECON.2014.7048867 · DOI
- 10.1016/S1570-7946(06)80021-0 · DOI
- 10.3182/20100701-2-PT-4011.00014 · DOI
- 10.1007/s12008-012-0156-x · DOI
- andrisano, 2011, Hybrid reconfigurable system design and optimization through virtual prototyping and digital manufacturing tools, International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM)
- eimaraghy, 2006, Flexible and reconfigurable manufacturing systems paradigms, International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems
- 2017, AAU Smart Productions Laboratory
- 10.1007/s11740-007-0066-0 · DOI
- 10.1115/1.2383196 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.compind.2005.01.010 · DOI
- korena, 1999, Recon-figurable manufacturing systems
- 10.7315/JCDE.2014.021 · DOI
- 10.7148/2010-0175-0181 · DOI
- joergensen, 2010, Re-configurable manufacturing systems as an application of mass customisation, International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management (IJIEM), 1
- eimaraghy, 2013, Product variety management, Manufacturing Technology, 62, 629
- 10.1109/ETFA.2008.4638359 · DOI
- 2017, The Cyber-Physical Factory
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Digital Twins in the IIoT: Current Practices and Future Directions Toward Industry 5.0
Mon, B. F., Hayajneh, M., Ali, N. A., Ullah, F., Ullah, H., & Alkobaisi, S. (2025) · Computers, Materials & Continua · doi:10.32604/cmc.2025.061411 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Mortensen, S. T., Chrysostomou, D., & Madsen, O.
- Affiliations
- Aalborg University (DK)
- Venue
- 2017 22nd IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2017-09
- Pages
- 1-4
- OpenAlex
- W2782650628
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 1.61
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA) (publishedVersion)
- VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Flexible and Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Digital Transformation in Industry
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Advanced Manufacturing and Logistics Optimization
- Keywords
- reconfigurable manufacturing systems, Industry 4.0, smart factory, manufacturing system reconfiguration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review