Cited by 12Flexible and Reconfigurable Manufacturing SystemsDigital Transformation in IndustryAdvanced Manufacturing and Logistics Optimization

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A novel framework for virtual recommissioning in reconfigurable manufacturing systems

Mortensen, Steffen Tram, Chrysostomou, Dimitrios, Madsen, Ole·2017·2017 22nd IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA)

Abstract

This paper defines a framework for virtual recommissioning in reconfigurable manufacturing systems. The need for virtual recommissioning arises with the multiple commissioning tasks in the life span of a reconfigurable manufacturing system. A classification of reconfiguration complexity and elementary abilities are combined in a reconfiguration matrix. The reconfiguration matrix serves as a framework for future research in virtual recommissioning. Lastly a preliminary exploration of virtual recommissioning is conducted on models of an Industry 4.0 Smart Factory demonstrator.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/etfa.2017.8247744

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. shahim, 2017, Economic justification of virtual commissioning in automation industry, Proceedings of the 2016 Winter Simulation Conference
  2. oppelt, 2014, Automatic model generation for virtual commissioning based on plant engineering data, Preprints of the 19th World Congress The International Federation of Automatic Control
  3. 10.1016/j.conengprac.2012.09.022 · DOI
  4. 10.1109/IECON.2014.7048867 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/S1570-7946(06)80021-0 · DOI
  6. 10.3182/20100701-2-PT-4011.00014 · DOI
  7. 10.1007/s12008-012-0156-x · DOI
  8. andrisano, 2011, Hybrid reconfigurable system design and optimization through virtual prototyping and digital manufacturing tools, International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM)
  9. eimaraghy, 2006, Flexible and reconfigurable manufacturing systems paradigms, International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems
  10. 2017, AAU Smart Productions Laboratory
  11. 10.1007/s11740-007-0066-0 · DOI
  12. 10.1115/1.2383196 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.compind.2005.01.010 · DOI
  14. korena, 1999, Recon-figurable manufacturing systems
  15. 10.7315/JCDE.2014.021 · DOI
  16. 10.7148/2010-0175-0181 · DOI
  17. joergensen, 2010, Re-configurable manufacturing systems as an application of mass customisation, International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management (IJIEM), 1
  18. eimaraghy, 2013, Product variety management, Manufacturing Technology, 62, 629
  19. 10.1109/ETFA.2008.4638359 · DOI
  20. 2017, The Cyber-Physical Factory

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Mortensen, S. T., Chrysostomou, D., & Madsen, O.
Affiliations
Aalborg University (DK)
Venue
2017 22nd IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2017-09
Pages
1-4
OpenAlex
W2782650628
Cited by
12
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2
FWCI
1.61
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA) (publishedVersion)
  • VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Flexible and Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Digital Transformation in Industry
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Advanced Manufacturing and Logistics Optimization
Keywords
reconfigurable manufacturing systems, Industry 4.0, smart factory, manufacturing system reconfiguration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review