Cited by 48Face recognition and analysisFace and Expression RecognitionEmotion and Mood Recognition

An automatic 3D expression recognition framework based on sparse representation of conformal images

Zeng, Wei, Li, Huibin, Chen, Liming, Morvan, Jean-Marie, Gu, Xianfeng David·2013·2013 10th IEEE International Conference and Workshops on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition (FG)

Abstract

We propose a general and fully automatic framework for 3D facial expression recognition by modeling sparse representation of conformal images. According to Riemann Geometry theory, a 3D facial surface S embedded in ℝ3, which is a topological disk, can be conformally mapped to a 2D unit disk D through the discrete surface Ricci Flow algorithm. Such a conformal mapping induces a unique and intrinsic surface conformal representation denoted by a pair of functions defined on D, called conformal factor image (CFI) and mean curvature image (MCI). As facial expression features, CFI captures the local area distortion of S induced by the conformal mapping; MCI characterizes the geometry information of S. To model sparse representation of conformal images for expression classification, both CFI and MCI are further normalized by a Mobius transformation. This transformation is defined by the three main facial landmarks (i.e. nose tip, left and right inner eye corners) which can be detected automatically and precisely. Expression recognition is carried out by the minimal sparse expression-class-dependent reconstruction error over the conformal image based expression dictionary. Extensive experimental results on the BU-3DFER dataset demonstrate the effectiveness and generalization of the proposed framework.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/fg.2013.6553749

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zeng, W., Li, H., Chen, L., Morvan, J.-M., & Gu, X. D.
Affiliations
  • Florida International University (US)
  • École Centrale de Lyon (FR)
  • Lyon 1 Université (FR)
  • State University of New York (US)
Venue
2013 10th IEEE International Conference and Workshops on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition (FG)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2013-04
Pages
1-8
ISSN
1541-5058 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2006943008
Cited by
48
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2
FWCI
3.62
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face and Expression Recognition
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
Keywords
3D facial expression recognition, conformal mapping, Möbius transformations, facial landmark detection, sparse representation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review