An automatic 3D expression recognition framework based on sparse representation of conformal images
Abstract
We propose a general and fully automatic framework for 3D facial expression recognition by modeling sparse representation of conformal images. According to Riemann Geometry theory, a 3D facial surface S embedded in ℝ3, which is a topological disk, can be conformally mapped to a 2D unit disk D through the discrete surface Ricci Flow algorithm. Such a conformal mapping induces a unique and intrinsic surface conformal representation denoted by a pair of functions defined on D, called conformal factor image (CFI) and mean curvature image (MCI). As facial expression features, CFI captures the local area distortion of S induced by the conformal mapping; MCI characterizes the geometry information of S. To model sparse representation of conformal images for expression classification, both CFI and MCI are further normalized by a Mobius transformation. This transformation is defined by the three main facial landmarks (i.e. nose tip, left and right inner eye corners) which can be detected automatically and precisely. Expression recognition is carried out by the minimal sparse expression-class-dependent reconstruction error over the conformal image based expression dictionary. Extensive experimental results on the BU-3DFER dataset demonstrate the effectiveness and generalization of the proposed framework.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Starting with the publication of the BU-3DFE dataset, which provides four different intensity levels for every expression, advancements in recognizing primary expressions from 3D samples were made.
“Starting with the publication of the BU-3DFE dataset which provides four different intensity levels for every expression, advancements in recognizing primary expressions from 3D samples were made [118], [120], [124], [125], [131], [133], [217].”
From Survey on RGB, 3D, Thermal, and Multimodal Approaches for Facial Expression Recognition: History, Trends, and Affect-Related Applications (2016) · cites this paper as [124]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Automatic analysis of facial expressions: the state of the art
Pantie, M., & Rothkrantz, L. J. M. (2000) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.895976 · Cited by 1,778 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Despite the great advancements has achieved, 2D/2D video facial texture image based facial expression recognition system still fails to solve the two major challenges: illumination changes and pose variations [7], [20], [17], [41].”
Background3D facial expression recognition based on automatically selected features
Tang, H., & Huang, T. S. (2008) · 2008 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops · doi:10.1109/cvprw.2008.4563052 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
Automatic facial expression recognition on a single 3D face by exploring shape deformation
Gong, B., Wang, Y., Liu, J., & Tang, X. (2009) · Proceedings of the 17th ACM international conference on Multimedia · doi:10.1145/1631272.1631358 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Corneanu, C. A., Simon, M. O., Cohn, J. F., & Guerrero, S. E. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2016.2515606 · Cited by 527 · see citing works
Multimodal 2D+3D Facial Expression Recognition With Deep Fusion Convolutional Neural Network
Li, H., Sun, J., Xu, Z., & Chen, L. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Multimedia · doi:10.1109/tmm.2017.2713408 · Cited by 211 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Zeng, W., Li, H., Chen, L., Morvan, J.-M., & Gu, X. D.
- Affiliations
- Florida International University (US)
- École Centrale de Lyon (FR)
- Lyon 1 Université (FR)
- State University of New York (US)
- Venue
- 2013 10th IEEE International Conference and Workshops on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition (FG)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2013-04
- Pages
- 1-8
- ISSN
- 1541-5058 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2006943008
- Cited by
- 48
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 3.62
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face and Expression Recognition
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
- Keywords
- 3D facial expression recognition, conformal mapping, Möbius transformations, facial landmark detection, sparse representation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review