A unified probabilistic framework for measuring the intensity of spontaneous facial action units
Abstract
Automatic facial expression analysis has received great attention in both academia and industry in the past two decades. Facial action coding system, which describes all possible facial expressions based on a set of anatomical facial muscle movements, called Action Unit (AU), is the most popularly used descriptive approach for analyzing facial expressions. In majority of the existing studies in the area of facial expression recognition, the focus has mostly been on facial action unit detection or basic facial expression recognition and there have been very few works on investigating the measuring the intensity of spontaneous facial actions. In addition, these works try to measure the intensity of facial actions statically and individually, ignoring the dependence among AUs, as well as the temporal information, which is crucial for analyzing spontaneous expression. To overcome this problem, this paper proposes a framework based on Dynamic Bayesian Network (DBN) to systematically model such relationships among spontaneous AUs for measuring their intensities. Our experimental results show improvement over image-driven methods alone in AU intensity measurement.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some works use probabilistic models of AUs combination likelihoods and intensity priors for improving performance.
“In order to overcome such limitations some works use probabilistic models of AUs combination likelihoods and intensity priors for improving performance [239], [240].”
From Survey on RGB, 3D, Thermal, and Multimodal Approaches for Facial Expression Recognition: History, Trends, and Affect-Related Applications (2016) · cites this paper as [240]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Histograms of Oriented Gradients for Human Detection
Dalal, N., & Triggs, B. (2005) · 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2005.177 · Cited by 33,584 · see citing works
Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability.
Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420 · Cited by 23,433 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Corneanu, C. A., Simon, M. O., Cohn, J. F., & Guerrero, S. E. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2016.2515606 · Cited by 527 · see citing works
- Authors
- Li, Y., Mavadati, S. M., Mahoor, M. H., & Ji, Q.
- Affiliations
- Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (US)
- University of Denver (US)
- Venue
- 2013 10th IEEE International Conference and Workshops on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition (FG)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2013-04
- Pages
- 1-7
- ISSN
- 1541-5058 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2081749143
- Cited by
- 36
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 8.16
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face and Expression Recognition
- Keywords
- facial action units, spontaneous facial expressions, facial expression analysis, dynamic Bayesian networks, facial expression recognition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review