Continuous AU intensity estimation using localized, sparse facial feature space
Abstract
Most work in automatic facial expression analysis seeks to detect discrete facial actions. Yet, the meaning and function of facial actions often depends in part on their intensity. We propose a part-based, sparse representation for automated measurement of continuous variation in AU intensity. We evaluated its effectiveness in two publically available databases, CK+ and the soon to be released Binghamton high-resolution spontaneous 3D dyadic facial expression database. The former consists of posed facial expressions and ordinal level intensity (absent, low, and high). The latter consists of spontaneous facial expression in response to diverse, well-validated emotion inductions, and 6 ordinal levels of AU intensity. In a preliminary test, we started from discrete emotion labels and ordinal-scale intensity annotation in the CK+ dataset. The algorithm achieved state-of-the-art performance. These preliminary results supported the utility of the part-based, sparse representation. Second, we applied the algorithm to the more demanding task of continuous AU intensity estimation in spontaneous facial behavior in the Binghamton database. Manual 6-point ordinal coding and continuous measurement were highly consistent. Visual analysis of the overlay of continuous measurement by the algorithm and manual ordinal coding strongly supported the representational power of the proposed method to smoothly interpolate across the full range of AU intensity.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Previous FER methods treat the texture or landmark modality independently, using only one modality for FER.
“Mostly, all previous work treats the texture or landmark modality independently, where only the texture or landmark modality is employed for FER.”
From Multimodal learning for facial expression recognition (2015) · cites this paper as [4]
Previous FER methods are two-step: handcrafted features are extracted from texture or landmark, then classifiers such as SVM or Adaboost are trained on the extracted features.
“As aforementioned, the previous FER methods can be regarded as a type of two-step methods.”
From Multimodal learning for facial expression recognition (2015) · cites this paper as [4]
Cites
Lucey, P., Cohn, J. F., Kanade, T., Saragih, J., Ambadar, Z., & Matthews, I. (2010) · 2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition - Workshops · doi:10.1109/cvprw.2010.5543262 · Cited by 4,303 · see citing works
Self-citationPrkachin, K. M., & Solomon, P. E. (2008) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2008.04.010 · Cited by 472 · see citing works
Continuous Pain Intensity Estimation from Facial Expressions
Kaltwang, S., Rudovic, O., & Pantic, M. (2012) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-33191-6_36 · Cited by 245 · see citing works
Facial expression recognition using Gabor motion energy filters
Wu, T., Bartlett, M. S., & Movellan, J. R. (2010) · 2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition - Workshops · doi:10.1109/cvprw.2010.5543267 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Corneanu, C. A., Simon, M. O., Cohn, J. F., & Guerrero, S. E. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2016.2515606 · Cited by 527 · see citing works
Self-citationFERA 2015 - second Facial Expression Recognition and Analysis challenge
Valstar, M. F., Almaev, T., Girard, J. M., McKeown, G., Mehu, M., Yin, L., Pantic, M., & Cohn, J. F. (2015) · 2015 11th IEEE International Conference and Workshops on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition (FG) · doi:10.1109/fg.2015.7284874 · Cited by 252 · see citing works
Self-citationMultimodal learning for facial expression recognition
Zhang, W., Zhang, Y., Ma, L., Guan, J., & Gong, S. (2015) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2015.04.012 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Estimating smile intensity: A better way
Girard, J. M., Cohn, J. F., & De la Torre, F. (2015) · Pattern Recognition Letters · doi:10.1016/j.patrec.2014.10.004 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Jeni, L. A., Girard, J. M., Cohn, J. F., & De La Torre, F.
- Affiliations
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- Venue
- 2013 10th IEEE International Conference and Workshops on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition (FG)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2013-04
- Pages
- 1-7
- ISSN
- 1541-5058 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2083261637
- Cited by
- 93
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 3
- FWCI
- 22.23
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face and Expression Recognition
- Keywords
- facial action units, sparse representation, spontaneous facial expressions, emotion induction, CK+ dataset
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review