Variable-state latent conditional random fields for facial expression recognition and action unit detection
Open accessAbstract
Automatic recognition of facial expressions of emotions, and detection of facial action units (AUs), from videos depends critically on modeling of their dynamics. These dynamics are characterized by changes in temporal phases (onset-apex-offset) and intensity of emotion/AUs, the appearance of which vary considerably among subjects, making the recognition/detection task very challenging. While state-of-the-art Latent Conditional Random Fields (LCRF) allow one to efficiently encode these dynamics via modeling of structural information (e.g., temporal consistency and ordinal constraints), their latent states are restricted to either unordered (nominal) or fully ordered (ordinal). However, such an approach is often too restrictive since, for instance, in the case of AU detection, the sequences of an active AU may better be described using ordinal latent states (corresponding to the AU intensity levels), while the sequences of this AU not being active may better be described using unordered (nominal) latent states. To this end, we propose the Variable-state LCRF model that automatically selects the optimal latent states (nominal or ordinal) for each sequence from each target class. This unsupervised adaptation of the model to individual sequence or subject contexts opens the possibility for improved model fitting and, subsequently, enhanced predictive performance. Our experiments on four public expression databases (CK+, AFEW, MMI and GEMEP-FERA) show that the proposed model consistently outperforms the state-of-the-art methods for both facial expression recognition and action unit detection from image sequences.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Increasing the number of recognized expressions usually follows two main directions: encoding expressions based on FACS action units instead of directly classifying them, and exploiting additional information provided by 3D facial data.
“Increasing the number of recognized expressions usually follows two main directions. First, expressions can be encoded based on FACS AUs [99], [113], [127], [139] instead of directly being classified. This provides a comprehensive coding of FEs without directly making a judgement on their intentionality. Other methods exploit additional information provided by 3D facial data.”
From Survey on RGB, 3D, Thermal, and Multimodal Approaches for Facial Expression Recognition: History, Trends, and Affect-Related Applications (2016) · cites this paper as [113]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 42 · Cited by 65
- Authors
- Walecki, R., Rudovic, O., Pavlovic, V., & Pantic, M.
- Affiliations
- Imperial College London (GB)
- Venue
- 2015 11th IEEE International Conference and Workshops on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition (FG)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2015-05
- Pages
- 1-8
- ISSN
- 1541-5058 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1903399393
- Cited by
- 65
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 15.59
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (645094, 0916812)
- Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (H2020/2014–2020, 645094)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face and Expression Recognition
- Keywords
- facial expression recognition, facial action unit detection, facial expression dynamics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review