The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Understanding Alternating Minimization for Matrix Completion
Open accessAbstract
Alternating minimization is a widely used and empirically successful heuristic for matrix completion and related low-rank optimization problems. Theoretical guarantees for alternating minimization have been hard to come by and are still poorly understood. This is in part because the heuristic is iterative and non-convex in nature. We give a new algorithm based on alternating minimization that provably recovers an unknown low-rank matrix from a random subsample of its entries under a standard incoherence assumption. Our results reduce the sample size requirements of the alternating minimization approach by at least a quartic factor in the rank and the condition number of the unknown matrix. These improvements apply even if the matrix is only close to low-rank in the Frobenius norm. Our algorithm runs in nearly linear time in the dimension of the matrix and, in a broad range of parameters, gives the strongest sample bounds among all subquadratic time algorithms that we are aware of. Underlying our work is a new robust convergence analysis of the well-known Power Method for computing the dominant singular vectors of a matrix. This viewpoint leads to a conceptually simple understanding of alternating minimization. In addition, we contribute a new technique for controlling the coherence of intermediate solutions arising in iterative algorithms based on a smoothed analysis of the QR factorization. These techniques may be of interest beyond their application here.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Calibrating Noise to Sensitivity in Private Data Analysis
Dwork, C., McSherry, F., Nissim, K., & Smith, A. (2006) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/11681878_14 · Cited by 7,272
Cited by
A Survey of Optimization Methods From a Machine Learning Perspective
Sun, S., Cao, Z., Zhu, H., & Zhao, J. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/tcyb.2019.2950779 · Cited by 789
Non-convex Optimization for Machine Learning
Jain, P., & Kar, P. (2017) · Foundations and Trends® in Machine Learning · doi:10.1561/2200000058 · Cited by 364
Nonconvex Optimization Meets Low-Rank Matrix Factorization: An Overview
Chi, Y., Lu, Y. M., & Chen, Y. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/tsp.2019.2937282 · Cited by 360
Complete Dictionary Recovery Over the Sphere I: Overview and the Geometric Picture
Sun, J., Qu, Q., & Wright, J. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.2016.2632162 · Cited by 213
Metadata
- Authors
- Hardt, M.
- Venue
- 2014 IEEE 55th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2014-10
- Pages
- 651-660
- ISSN
- 0272-5428 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1994719275
- Cited by
- 216
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 44.32
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Understanding Alternating Minimization for Matrix Completion. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/focs.2014.75
- The paper
- Hardt, M. (2014). Understanding Alternating Minimization for Matrix Completion. 2014 IEEE 55th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science. https://doi.org/10.1109/focs.2014.75
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.