Cited by 35Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)Ethics and Social Impacts of AIFuzzy Logic and Control Systems

A Type-2 Fuzzy Logic Approach to Explainable AI for regulatory compliance, fair customer outcomes and market stability in the Global Financial Sector

Adams, Janet, Hagras, Hani·2020·2020 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE)

Abstract

The field of Artificial Intelligence (AI) is enjoying unprecedented success and is dramatically transforming the landscape of the financial services industry. However, there is a strong need to develop an accountability and explainability framework for AI in financial services, based on a risk-based assessment of appropriate explainability levels and techniques by use case and domain. This paper proposes a risk management framework for the implementation of AI in banking with consideration of explainability and outlines the implementation requirements to enable AI to achieve positive outcomes for financial institutions and the customers, markets and societies they serve. The work presents the evaluation of three algorithmic approaches (Neural Networks, Logistic Regression and Type 2 Fuzzy Logic with evolutionary optimisation) for nine banking use cases. We review the emerging regulatory and industry guidance on ethical and safe adoption of AI from key markets worldwide and compare leading AI explainability techniques. We will show that the Type-2 Fuzzy Logic models deliver very good performance which is comparable to or lagging marginally behind the Neural Network models in terms of accuracy, but outperform all models for explainability, thus they are recommended as a suitable machine learning approach for use cases in financial services from an explainability perspective. This research is important for several reasons: (i) there is limited knowledge and understanding of the…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/fuzz48607.2020.9177542

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 21 · Cited by 35

Authors
Adams, J., & Hagras, H.
Affiliations
  • Lloyds Banking Group (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • University of Essex (GB)
Venue
2020 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2020-07
Pages
1-8
ISSN
1098-7584 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3082690842
Cited by
35
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.34
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Fuzzy Logic and Control Systems
Keywords
type-2 fuzzy logic, explainable AI, banking sector, financial services, regulatory compliance, AI risk management, market stability, consumer trust, artificial neural networks, logistic regression, evolutionary optimization, AI ethics, AI regulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review