Cited by 45Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationUltrasound in Clinical ApplicationsICT in Developing Communities

Low-Cost Teleradiology for Rural Ultrasound

DeStigter, Kristen K., Morey, G. Eli, Garra, Brian S., Rielly, Matthew R., Anderson, Martin E., Kawooya, Michael G., Matovu, Alphonsus, Miele, Frank R.·2011·2011 IEEE Global Humanitarian Technology Conference

Abstract

In under-resourced communities, there are several preventable pregnancy complications that can lead to significant maternal or perinatal morbidity and mortality when left untreated. The lack of access to prenatal imaging is one of many factors that contribute to the greater mortality rates in such populations. Analysis of the most common complications suggest that even limited access to obstetric ultrasound imaging could have a positive impact, particularly in a rural context in which imaging can prompt transport of the patient to a capable facility. The authors describe their work to establish and validate an obstetric care model in Uganda, and the design and for a clinical study to measure this model's efficacy in terms of improving outcomes at delivery. The central objective of this care model is to reduce mortality in remote locations by providing expectant mothers and their primary care-givers with advance notice of complications so that women at risk can be referred to appropriate care centers in time. The components of this model are described, including portable ultrasound machine, scanning protocols for clinical data acquisition by local operators, custom clinical data compression and transmission capabilities, and internet-based infrastructure for remote reading and reporting. The objectives, hypotheses, and design of the associated clinical outcomes study and progress to date are also presented.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/ghtc.2011.39

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
DeStigter, K. K., Morey, G. E., Garra, B. S., Rielly, M. R., Anderson, M. E., Kawooya, M. G., Matovu, A., & Miele, F. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Vermont (US)
  • Center for Devices and Radiological Health (US)
  • Mengo Hospital (UG)
  • Kamuli Mission Hospital (UG)
Venue
2011 IEEE Global Humanitarian Technology Conference
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2011-10
Pages
290-295
OpenAlex
W2018493331
Cited by
45
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
22.54
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Global Humanitarian Technology Conference (GHTC) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Ultrasound in Clinical Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › ICT in Developing Communities
Keywords
teleradiology, pregnancy complications, maternal mortality, perinatal outcomes, portable ultrasound, telemedicine, Uganda

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review