Cited by 7Privacy, Security, and Data ProtectionAdvanced Authentication Protocols SecurityUser Authentication and Security Systems

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

OLYMPUS: A distributed privacy-preserving identity management system

Moreno, Rafael Torres, Rodriguez, Jesus Garcia, Lopez, Cristina Timon, Bernabe, Jorge Bernal, Skarmeta, Antonio·2020·2020 Global Internet of Things Summit (GIoTS)

Abstract

Despite the latest initiatives and research efforts to increase user privacy in digital scenarios, identity-related cybercrimes such as identity theft, wrong identity or user transactions surveillance are growing. In particular, blanket surveillance that might be potentially accomplished by Identity Providers (IdPs) contradicts the data minimization principle laid out in GDPR. Hence, user movements across Service Providers (SPs) might be tracked by malicious IdPs that become a central dominant entity, as well as a single point of failure in terms of privacy and security, putting users at risk when compromised. To cope with this issue, the OLYMPUS H2020 EU project is devising a truly privacy-preserving, yet user-friendly, and distributed identity management system that addresses the data minimization challenge in both online and offline scenarios. Thus, OLYMPUS divides the role of the IdP among various authorities by relying on threshold cryptography, thereby preventing user impersonation and surveillance from malicious or nosy IdPs. This paper overviews the OLYMPUS framework, including requirements considered, the proposed architecture, a series of use cases as well as the privacy analysis from the legal point of view.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/giots49054.2020.9119663

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. 10.1007/3-540-68339-9_17 · DOI
  2. 2019, Personal Identification – ISO Compliant Driving Licence – Part 5 Mobile Driving Licence (mDL) application
  3. richards, 2012, The dangers of surveillance, Harv L Rev, 126, 1934
  4. mitsilegas, 2015, Surveillance and digital privacy in the transatlantic war on terror: the case for a global privacy regime, 11 Colum Hum Rts L Rev, 47, 1
  5. 10.1515/icl-2010-0306 · DOI
  6. 10.1080/13600860902742596 · DOI
  7. 10.1145/1179529.1179532 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1007/978-3-319-14439-9 · DOI · Paper page
  9. longley, 2019, Verifiable credentials data model 1.0, W3C Recommendation
  10. 10.1145/3243734.3243839 · DOI
  11. baum, 2019, Pesto: Proactively secure distributed single sign-on, or how to trust a hacked server, Cryptology ePrint Archive Report
  12. 10.1145/586111.586114 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1016/j.future.2019.08.017 · DOI
  14. camenisch, 2020, Short threshold dynamic group signatures, Cryptology ePrint Archive Report

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 7

Metadata

Authors
Moreno, R. T., Rodriguez, J. G., Lopez, C. T., Bernabe, J. B., & Skarmeta, A.
Affiliations
Universidad de Murcia (ES)
Venue
2020 Global Internet of Things Summit (GIoTS)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2020-06
Volume
126
Pages
1-6
OpenAlex
W3035862432
Cited by
7
References
2
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 4
FWCI
2.65
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Global Internet of Things Summit (GIoTS) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Advanced Authentication Protocols Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › User Authentication and Security Systems
Keywords
privacy-preserving identity, identity provider, data minimization, GDPR, threshold cryptography, identity theft, surveillance, single point of failure, privacy analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review