Cited by 27IoT and Edge/Fog ComputingVehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)Real-Time Systems Scheduling

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Latency Prediction for Delay-sensitive V2X Applications in Mobile Cloud/Edge Computing Systems

Zhang, Wenhan, Feng, Mingjie, Krunz, Marwan, Volos, Haris·2020·GLOBECOM 2020 - 2020 IEEE Global Communications Conference

Abstract

Mobile edge computing (MEC) is a key enabler of delay-sensitive vehicle-to-everything (V2X) applications. Determining where to execute a task necessitates accurate estimation of the offloading latency. In this paper, we propose a latency prediction framework that integrates machine learning and statistical approaches. Aided by extensive latency measurements collected during driving, we first preprocess the data and divide it into two components: one that follows a trackable trend over time and the other that behaves like random noise. We then develop a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) network to predict the first component. This LSTM network captures the trend in latency over time. We further enhance the prediction accuracy of this technique by employing a k-medoids classification method. For the second component, we propose a statistical approach using a combination of Epanechnikov Kernel and moving average functions. Experimental results show that the proposed prediction approach reduces the prediction error to half of a standard deviation (STD) of the raw data.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/globecom42002.2020.9348104

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. 10.1007/s11036-019-01302-x · DOI
  2. 10.1109/SAHCN.2017.7964938 · DOI
  3. 10.1109/TNNLS.2015.2428738 · DOI
  4. 10.1007/978-3-030-32047-8_16 · DOI
  5. 10.1109/SAHCN.2019.8824922 · DOI
  6. 2017, Toward fully connected vehicles Edge computing for advanced automotive communications
  7. 10.1109/JIOT.2018.2876279 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1109/TVT.2019.2904244 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1109/VTCFall.2018.8691027 · DOI
  10. 2010, LTE requirements for Evolved UTRA (E-UTRA) and Evolved UTRAN (E-UTRAN)
  11. 10.1109/TIV.2018.2874555 · DOI
  12. 2018, White Paper
  13. 10.1109/JIOT.2018.2877510 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Zhang, W., Feng, M., Krunz, M., & Volos, H.
Affiliations
  • University of Arizona (US)
  • Denso (United States) (US)
Venue
GLOBECOM 2020 - 2020 IEEE Global Communications Conference
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2020-12
Pages
1-6
ISSN
1930-529X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3129493926
Cited by
27
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2
FWCI
2.52
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Globecom (publishedVersion)
  • UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
NSF (CNS-1910348,CNS-1813401)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Real-Time Systems Scheduling
Keywords
latency prediction, vehicle-to-everything communication, mobile edge computing, mobile cloud computing, task offloading, delay-sensitive applications, LSTM, Epanechnikov kernel, moving average, vehicular networks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review