The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Diversifying the Internet
Abstract
The Internet has fallen victim to its own stunning success. The interplay of the end-to-end design of IP and the vested interests of competing stakeholders has led to its growing ossification. Alterations to the Internet architecture that address its fundamental deficiencies or enable new services have been restricted to incremental changes. The slow pace of this process stifles innovation and the adoption of disruptive technology. A recent call to arms advances a research agenda to confront this impasse through virtualization (L. Peterson et al., 2004). In addition to describing a virtual testbed for the evaluation of new network architectures, it poses a question about the long-term role of virtualization in the Internet. The architectural "purist" views virtualization as a tool for architecture evaluation and the periodic deployment of successive, singular Internet architectures. In this paper, we advance the "pluralist" view that seeks to make virtualization an architectural attribute of the Internet. By enabling a plurality of diverse network architectures to coexist on a shared physical substrate, virtualization mitigates the ossifying forces at work in the current Internet and enables continual introduction of innovative network technologies. Such a diversified Internet would allow existing architectural deficiencies to be holistically addressed as well as enable the introduction of new architectures supporting new types of applications and services. We provide a detailed exposition of the diversified Internet concept, explain how it can address the problem of network ossification and discuss some of the technical challenges that must be met to turn the vision into reality
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
PlanetLab: an overlay testbed for broad-coverage services
Chun, B., Culler, D., Roscoe, T., Bavier, A., Peterson, L., Wawrzoniak, M., & Bowman, M. (2003) · ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review · doi:10.1145/956993.956995 · Cited by 1,031
Overcoming the Internet impasse through virtualization
Anderson, T., Peterson, L., Shenker, S., & Turner, J. (2005) · Computer · doi:10.1109/mc.2005.136 · Cited by 922
Self-citationToward a Framework for Internet Forensic Analysis
Sekar, V., Xie, Y., Maltz, D. A., Reiter, M. K., & Zhang, H. (2004) · Cited by 54
A virtualized link layer with support for indirection
Gold, R., Gunningberg, P., & Tschudin, C. (2004) · doi:10.1145/1016707.1016713 · Cited by 19
Cited by
Hybrid SDN evolution: A comprehensive survey of the state-of-the-art
Khorsandroo, S., Sánchez, A. G., Tosun, A. S., Arco, J., & Doriguzzi-Corin, R. (2021) · Computer Networks · doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2021.107981 · Cited by 111
Metadata
- Authors
- Turner, J. S., & Taylor, D. E.
- Venue
- GLOBECOM '05. IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, 2005.
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2005
- Pages
- 6 pp.-760
- OpenAlex
- W2137039049
- Cited by
- 316
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 3.66
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diversifying the Internet. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/glocom.2005.1577741
- The paper
- Turner, J. S., & Taylor, D. E. (2005). Diversifying the Internet. GLOBECOM '05. IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1109/glocom.2005.1577741
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.