The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Coexistence of Terrestrial and Aerial Users in Cellular Networks
Open accessAbstract
Enabling the integration of aerial mobile users into existing cellular networks would make possible a number of promising applications. However, current cellular networks have not been designed to serve aerial users, and hence an exploration of design parameters is required in order to allow network providers to modify their current infrastructure. As a first step in this direction, this paper provides an in-depth analysis of the coverage probability of the downlink of a cellular network that serves both aerial and ground users. We present an exact mathematical characterization of the coverage probability, which includes the effect of base stations (BSs) height, antenna pattern and drone altitude for various types of urban environments. Interestingly, our results show that the favorable propagation conditions that aerial users enjoy due to their altitude is also their strongest limiting factor, as it leaves them vulnerable to interference. This negative effect can be substantially reduced by optimizing the flying altitude, the base station height and antenna down-tilt angle. Moreover, lowering the base station height and increasing down-tilt angle are in general beneficial for both terrestrial and aerial users, pointing out a possible path to enable their coexistence.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Evolution of Non-Terrestrial Networks From 5G to 6G: A Survey
Azari, M. M., Solanki, S., Chatzinotas, S., Kodheli, O., Sallouha, H., Colpaert, A., Mendoza Montoya, J. F., Pollin, S., Haqiqatnejad, A., Mostaani, A., et al. (2022) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2022.3199901 · Cited by 668
Self-citationCellular-Enabled UAV Communication: A Connectivity-Constrained Trajectory Optimization Perspective
Zhang, S., Zeng, Y., & Zhang, R. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Communications · doi:10.1109/tcomm.2018.2880468 · Cited by 426
A Tutorial on UAVs for Wireless Networks: Applications, Challenges, and Open Problems
Mozaffari, M., Saad, W., Bennis, M., Nam, Y.-H., & Debbah, M. (2019) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2019.2902862 · Cited by 299
Cognition in UAV-Aided 5G and Beyond Communications: A Survey
Ullah, Z., Al-Turjman, F., & Mostarda, L. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and Networking · doi:10.1109/tccn.2020.2968311 · Cited by 226
Metadata
- Authors
- Azari, M. M., Rosas, F., Chiumento, A., & Pollin, S.
- Venue
- 2017 IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2017-12
- Pages
- 1-6
- OpenAlex
- W2763830955
- Cited by
- 182
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 47.58
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Coexistence of Terrestrial and Aerial Users in Cellular Networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/glocomw.2017.8269068
- The paper
- Azari, M. M., Rosas, F., Chiumento, A., & Pollin, S. (2017). Coexistence of Terrestrial and Aerial Users in Cellular Networks. 2017 IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps). https://doi.org/10.1109/glocomw.2017.8269068
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.