The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Multi-Objective Virtual Machine Placement in Virtualized Data Center Environments
Abstract
Server consolidation using virtualization technology has become increasingly important for improving data center efficiency. It enables one physical server to host multiple independent virtual machines (VMs), and the transparent movement of workloads from one server to another. Fine-grained virtual machine resource allocation and reallocation are possible in order to meet the performance targets of applications running on virtual machines. On the other hand, these capabilities create demands on system management, especially for large-scale data centers. In this paper, a two-level control system is proposed to manage the mappings of workloads to VMs and VMs to physical resources. The focus is on the VM placement problem which is posed as a multi-objective optimization problem of simultaneously minimizing total resource wastage, power consumption and thermal dissipation costs. An improved genetic algorithm with fuzzy multi-objective evaluation is proposed for efficiently searching the large solution space and conveniently combining possibly conflicting objectives. The simulation-based evaluation using power-consumption and thermal-dissipation models based on profiling of a Blade Center, demonstrates the good performance, scalability and robustness of our proposed approach. Compared with four well-known bin-packing algorithms and two single-objective approaches, the solutions obtained from our approach seek good balance among the conflicting objectives while others cannot.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Zeng, D., Gu, L., Guo, S., Cheng, Z., & Yu, S. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Computers · doi:10.1109/tc.2016.2536019 · Cited by 426
Optimizing Virtual Machine placement in IaaS data centers: Taxonomy, review and open issues
Talebian, H., Gani, A., Sookhak, M., Abdelatif, A. A., Yousafzai, A., Vasilakos, A. V., & Yu, F. R. (2020) · Cluster Computing · doi:10.1007/s10586-019-02954-w · Cited by 72
Multi-objective Virtual Machine Placement with Service Level Agreement: A Memetic Algorithm Approach
Pires, F. L., & Baran, B. (2013) · 2013 IEEE/ACM 6th International Conference on Utility and Cloud Computing · doi:10.1109/ucc.2013.44 · Cited by 66
Virtual Machine Placement Based on Ant Colony Optimization for Minimizing Resource Wastage
Tawfeek, M. A., El-Sisi, A. B., Keshk, A. E., & Torkey, F. A. (2014) · Communications in Computer and Information Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-13461-1_16 · Cited by 45
A multi-objective krill herd algorithm for virtual machine placement in cloud computing
Baalamurugan, K. M., & Vijay Bhanu, S. (2020) · The Journal of Supercomputing · doi:10.1007/s11227-018-2516-1 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Xu, J., & Fortes, J. A. B.
- Venue
- 2010 IEEE/ACM Int'l Conference on Green Computing and Communications & Int'l Conference on Cyber, Physical and Social Computing
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2010-12
- Pages
- 179-188
- OpenAlex
- W2541557612
- Cited by
- 529
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.17
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multi-Objective Virtual Machine Placement in Virtualized Data Center Environments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/greencom-cpscom.2010.137
- The paper
- Xu, J., & Fortes, J. A. B. (2010). Multi-Objective Virtual Machine Placement in Virtualized Data Center Environments. 2010 IEEE/ACM Int'l Conference on Green Computing and Communications & Int'l Conference on Cyber, Physical and Social Computing. https://doi.org/10.1109/greencom-cpscom.2010.137
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.