Cited by 281Blockchain Technology Applications and SecurityCloud Data Security SolutionsBlockchain Technology in Education and Learning

Blockchain-based Personal Health Data Sharing System Using Cloud Storage

Open access
Zheng, Xiaochen, Mukkamala, Raghava Rao, Vatrapu, Ravi, Ordieres-Mere, Joaqun·2018·2018 IEEE 20th International Conference on e-Health Networking, Applications and Services (Healthcom)

Abstract

With the advent of rapid development of wearable technology and mobile computing, huge amount of personal health-related data is being generated and accumulated on continuous basis at every moment. These personal datasets contain valuable information and they belong to and asset of the individual users, hence should be owned and controlled by themselves. Currently most of such datasets are stored and controlled by different service providers and this centralised data storage brings challenges of data security and hinders the data sharing. These personal health data are valuable resources for healthcare research and commercial projects. In this research work, we propose a conceptual design for sharing personal continuous-dynamic health data using blockchain technology supplemented by cloud storage to share the health-related information in a secure and transparent manner. Besides, we also introduce a data quality inspection module based on machine learning techniques to have control over data quality. The primary goal of the proposed system is to enable users to own, control and share their personal health data securely, in a General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) compliant way to get benefit from their personal datasets. It also provides an efficient way for researchers and commercial data consumers to collect high quality personal health data for research and commercial purposes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/healthcom.2018.8531125

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 30 · Cited by 281

Authors
Zheng, X., Mukkamala, R. R., Vatrapu, R., & Ordieres-Mere, J.
Affiliations
Copenhagen Business School (DK)
Venue
2018 IEEE 20th International Conference on e-Health Networking, Applications and Services (Healthcom)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2018-09
Pages
1-6
OpenAlex
W2900659066
Cited by
281
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 64 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
19.03
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • IEEE International Conference on e-Health Networking, Applications and Services (Healthcom) (publishedVersion)
  • CBS Research Portal (Copenhagen Business School) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Region Hovedstaden
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cloud Data Security Solutions
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology in Education and Learning
Keywords
blockchain, personal health data, health data sharing, cloud storage, data ownership, data security, machine learning, GDPR compliance, wearable devices, data provenance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review