Cited by 28Context-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsWireless Sensor Networks for Data AnalysisTechnology Use by Older Adults

Persuasive and Pervasive Sensing: A New Frontier to Monitor, Track and Assist Older Adults Suffering from Type-2 Diabetes

Chatterjee, Samir, Dutta, Kaushik, Xie, Harry (Qi), Byun, Jongbok, Pottathil, Akshay, Moore, Miles·2013·2013 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences

Abstract

California like the entire nation is aging. There are 4.3 million Californians 65 and older accounting for about 11% of the total state population. We also find that 58% of older adults have high blood pressure; about 21% have been told that they have diabetes. California in particular has the highest incidence of new diabetes cases and nearly 4 million people (diagnosed and undiagnosed) are estimated to be suffering from the disease. Diabetes is a chronic disease, which if unchecked leads to acute and long-term complications and ultimately death. Our older adult population often lacks the cognitive resources to deal with the daily self-management regimens. Many unpaid family members are caring for them today but this is unsustainable. In this paper, we discuss the design and implementation of a wireless sensor network system within the home environment that captures activity of daily living. We mine the data and provide feedback via SMS/text (daily) and tailored newsletter (weekly). We introduce a novel idea called "persuasive sensing" and report results from two home implementations that are showing exciting promise. Moreover we show that with the help of an Artificial Neural Network, we can predict blood-glucose levels for the next day from accumulated data with an accuracy of 94%. The predictive model presented here is a break-through in at-home sensing research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/hicss.2013.618

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 13 · Cited by 28

Authors
Chatterjee, S., Dutta, K., Xie, H. (., Byun, J., Pottathil, A., & Moore, M.
Affiliations
  • Claremont Graduate University (US)
  • National University of Singapore (SG)
  • Amazon (United States) (US)
Venue
2013 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2013-01
Pages
2636-2645
ISSN
1530-1605 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2047647548
Cited by
28
References
13
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.91
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) (publishedVersion)
  • National University of Singapore (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Wireless Sensor Networks for Data Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, older adults, home monitoring, wireless sensor networks, activities of daily living, blood glucose prediction, artificial neural networks, self-management, pervasive sensing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review