CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 193Social Robot Interaction and HRIChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentAction Observation and Synchronization

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

No fair!! An interaction with a cheating robot

Short, Elaine, Hart, Justin, Vu, Michelle, Scassellati, Brian·2010·2010 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI)
DOI 10.1109/hri.2010.5453193
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Using a humanoid robot and a simple children's game, we examine the degree to which variations in behavior result in attributions of mental state and intentionality. Participants play the well-known children's game ¿rock-paper-scissors¿ against a robot that either plays fairly, or that cheats in one of two ways. In the ¿verbal cheat¿ condition, the robot announces the wrong outcome on several rounds which it loses, declaring itself the winner. In the ¿action cheat¿ condition, the robot changes its gesture after seeing its opponent's play. We find that participants display a greater level of social engagement and make greater attributions of mental state when playing against the robot in the conditions in which it cheats.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/hri.2010.5453193

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most studies in the review used controlled user experiments to evaluate error recovery strategies and reactions to errors.

    “however most studies used controlled user experiments (e.g., Spexard et al., 2008; Short et al., 2010; Desai et al., 2013; Salem et al., 2013, 2015; Gompei and Umemuro, 2015; Knepper et al., 2015; Hayes et al., 2016; Ragni et al., 2016; Robinette et al., 2016; Mirnig et al., 2017; Lucas et al., 2018).”

    From Understanding and Resolving Failures in Human-Robot Interaction: Literature Review and Model Development (2018) · cites this paper as Short et al., 2010

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. 10.1016/0010-0277(90)90051-K · DOI
  2. 10.1145/1121241.1121311 · DOI
  3. 10.1006/ijhc.1995.1042 · DOI
  4. 10.1145/1349822.1349836 · DOI
  5. steinfeld, 2008, The oz of wizard: Simulating the human for interaction research, HRI '09 Proc of the 4th ACM IEEE intl conf on Human robot interaction, 101
  6. 10.1142/S0219843605000569 · DOI
  7. lombard, 2000, Measuring presence: A literature-based approach to the development of a standardized paper-and-pencil instrument, Presence 2000 The Third International Workshop on Presence
  8. 10.1109/IROS.2004.1389967 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/j.artint.2005.03.005 · DOI
  10. 10.1145/1514095.1514110 · DOI
  11. 10.1145/1514095.1514102 · DOI
  12. breazeal, 2001, Affective interaction between humans and robots, Proc 6th Eur Conf Advances in Artif Life (ECAL'01), 582, 10.1007/3-540-44811-X_66 · DOI
  13. 10.1109/DEVLRN.2008.4640798 · DOI
  14. 10.1109/IROS.1999.812787 · DOI
  15. 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01506-0 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Short, E., Hart, J., Vu, M., & Scassellati, B.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
ORCID
Venue
2010 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2010-03
Pages
219-226
DOI
10.1109/hri.2010.5453193
OpenAlex
W3150639857
Cited by
193
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
6.18
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
Keywords
human-robot interaction, mental state attribution, intentionality, theory of mind, social engagement, rock-paper-scissors, humanoid robots, deception, children's games

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review