The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Evaluating impact of security on OPC UA performance
Abstract
The widespread use of OPC UA specification in client/server data exchange in industrial environment introduces many benefits as it allows to keep open the market of the industrial applications, due to the presence of a standard, worldwide and vendor-independent specification. On the other hand, the use of a software infrastructures (complex in the case of OPC UA) between industrial applications and devices (e.g. mainframes, PLC, microcontroller), may impact on the overall performance of the communication between industrial applications. The aim of this paper is to deal with the performance evaluation of OPC UA, pointing out all the main features which could influence performance in the client/server exchange of information. On the basis of the considerations about performance of OPC UA specification, outlined in the paper as said before, some results of a performance evaluation carried on by the authors will be presented; it will focus on the impact of OPC UA security mechanisms on the relevant performance.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Machine learning techniques can be very useful for implementing strategies using an anomaly based unsupervised detection [11] approach for detecting attacks on SCADA systems.”
From Assessing and augmenting SCADA cyber security: A survey of techniques (2017) · cites this paper as [11]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Assessing and augmenting SCADA cyber security: A survey of techniques
Nazir, S., Patel, S., & Patel, D. (2017) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2017.06.010 · Cited by 167
“The OPC UA (Unified Architecture) is an open industrial [120], [121] Machine-to-Machine communication protocol that replaced OPC DA.”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Cavalieri, S., Cutuli, G., & Monteleone, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Catania (IT)
- Venue
- 3rd International Conference on Human System Interaction
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2010-05
- Pages
- 687-694
- OpenAlex
- W2021138621
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 4.55
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Conference on Human System Interactions (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Industrial Automation and Control Systems
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Digital Transformation in Industry
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Power Systems and Technologies
- Keywords
- OPC UA, security mechanisms, communication performance, client-server communication, industrial automation, performance evaluation, microcontroller
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
