The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Detecting malicious inclusions in secure hardware: Challenges and solutions
Abstract
This paper addresses a new threat to the security of integrated circuits (ICs) used in safety critical, security and military systems. The migration of IC fabrication to low-cost foundries has made ICs vulnerable to malicious alterations, that could, under specific conditions, result in functional changes and/or catastrophic failure of the system in which they are embedded. We refer to such malicious alternations and inclusions as Hardware Trojans. The modification(s) introduced by the Trojan depends on the application, with some designed to disable the system or degrade signal integrity, while others are designed to defeat hardware security and encryption to leak plain text information. This paper explores the wide range of malicious alternations of ICs that are possible and proposes a general framework for their classification. The taxonomy is essential for properly evaluating the effectiveness of methods designed to detect Trojans. The latter portion of the paper explores several Trojan detection strategies and the classes of Trojans each is most likely to detect.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Trojan Detection using IC Fingerprinting
Agrawal, D., Baktir, S., Karakoyunlu, D., Rohatgi, P., & Sunar, B. (2007) · 2007 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP '07) · doi:10.1109/sp.2007.36 · Cited by 793
Building secure software: how to avoid security problems the right way
Frazer, K. (2002) · ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes · doi:10.1145/511152.511169 · Cited by 268
Cited by
A Survey of Hardware Trojan Taxonomy and Detection
Tehranipoor, M., & Koushanfar, F. (2010) · IEEE Design & Test of Computers · doi:10.1109/mdt.2010.7 · Cited by 1,424
Self-citationTrustworthy Hardware: Identifying and Classifying Hardware Trojans
Karri, R., Rajendran, J., Rosenfeld, K., & Tehranipoor, M. (2010) · Computer · doi:10.1109/mc.2010.299 · Cited by 532
Self-citationHardware Trojans: Lessons Learned after One Decade of Research
Xiao, K., Forte, D., Jin, Y., Karri, R., Bhunia, S., & Tehranipoor, M. (2017) · ACM Transactions on Design Automation of Electronic Systems · doi:10.1145/2906147 · Cited by 473
Self-citationHardware Trojan: Threats and emerging solutions
Chakraborty, R. S., Narasimhan, S., & Bhunia, S. (2009) · 2009 IEEE International High Level Design Validation and Test Workshop · doi:10.1109/hldvt.2009.5340158 · Cited by 468
A Novel Technique for Improving Hardware Trojan Detection and Reducing Trojan Activation Time
Salmani, H., Tehranipoor, M., & Plusquellic, J. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems · doi:10.1109/tvlsi.2010.2093547 · Cited by 297
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, X., Tehranipoor, M., & Plusquellic, J.
- Venue
- 2008 IEEE International Workshop on Hardware-Oriented Security and Trust
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2008-06
- Pages
- 15-19
- OpenAlex
- W2098536553
- Cited by
- 324
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.63
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Detecting malicious inclusions in secure hardware: Challenges and solutions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/hst.2008.4559039
- The paper
- Wang, X., Tehranipoor, M., & Plusquellic, J. (2008). Detecting malicious inclusions in secure hardware: Challenges and solutions. 2008 IEEE International Workshop on Hardware-Oriented Security and Trust. https://doi.org/10.1109/hst.2008.4559039
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.