Cited by 41Advanced Battery Technologies ResearchAdvancements in Battery MaterialsControl Systems and Identification

Performance Comparison of NARX & RNN-LSTM Neural Networks for LiFePO4 Battery State of Charge Estimation

Abbas, Ghulam, Nawaz, Menaa, Kamran, Farrukh·2019·2019 16th International Bhurban Conference on Applied Sciences and Technology (IBCAST)

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to evaluate the performance of NARX network and an improved RNN with LSTM artificial neural networks to estimate the SOC of LiFePO4 batteries used in EVs, HEVs, UAVs, UUVs and energy storage systems for power electronics and solar power systems. Due to unequal self-discharge rates, difference in current leakage and temperature under repeated charge discharge cycles of the battery pack, made by series and parallel combinations of different cells to increase the power rating for different applications, the SOC of each battery cell mismatched with respect to others. Therefore, an accurate estimation of SOC is required for optimal power use of Li-Ion battery pack. In this research two neural network models for SOC estimation of LiFePO4 batteries are designed and their performance is evaluated on different parameters. These models are trained by optimal selection of hyper parameters using real time data of voltage, current and battery pack temperature as input and SOC as output of the models. The input dataset has been preprocessed as multivariate time series forecasting problem for RNN-LSTM neural network. The tested results showed that accurate results with an RMSE lower than 0.001 is achieved in NARX and lower than 0.002 is achieved in RNN-LSTM at different test datasets. However, RNN-LSTM has better performance than NARX in multivariate time series in seq2seq future forecasting configuration with an RMSE lower than 0.003 at different test datasets with a temperature range of 5 to 25°C.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/ibcast.2019.8667172

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 24 · Cited by 41

Authors
Abbas, G., Nawaz, M., & Kamran, F.
Affiliations
HITEC University (PK)
Venue
2019 16th International Bhurban Conference on Applied Sciences and Technology (IBCAST)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2019-01
Pages
463-468
OpenAlex
W2921514808
Cited by
41
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2
FWCI
6.22
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Bhurban Conference on Applied Sciences and Technology (IBCAST) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Advanced Battery Technologies Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advancements in Battery Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Control Systems and Identification
Keywords
lithium iron phosphate batteries, state of charge estimation, NARX neural network, LSTM neural network, multivariate time series forecasting, cell mismatch, battery temperature effects, electric vehicles, energy storage systems, hyperparameter optimization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review