The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Game development life cycle guidelines
Abstract
Game is a kind of software with goal to provide entertainment. However, during the real game development practice, simply adopting the software development life cycle (SDLC) is not enough, as the developers face several challenges during its life cycle. To address the problem, game development uses a kind of specific approach called game development life cycle (GDLC) to direct the game development. However, none of the existing GDLCs explicitly address how to successfully deliver a good quality game. This paper presents a new game development life cycle model and guidelines to successfully deliver a good quality game. Several quality criterias are explicitly considered at each phase.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Applications of AI in classical software engineering
Barenkamp, M., Rebstadt, J., & Thomas, O. (2020) · AI Perspectives · doi:10.1186/s42467-020-00005-4 · Cited by 123
Metadata
- Authors
- Ramadan, R., & Widyani, Y.
- Venue
- 2013 International Conference on Advanced Computer Science and Information Systems (ICACSIS)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2013-09
- Pages
- 95-100
- OpenAlex
- W1968362026
- Cited by
- 216
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.42
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Game development life cycle guidelines. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/icacsis.2013.6761558
- The paper
- Ramadan, R., & Widyani, Y. (2013). Game development life cycle guidelines. 2013 International Conference on Advanced Computer Science and Information Systems (ICACSIS). https://doi.org/10.1109/icacsis.2013.6761558
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
