Cited by 67Imbalanced Data Classification TechniquesMachine Learning and Data ClassificationData Stream Mining Techniques

A Review on Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques

Basha, Shaik Johny, Madala, Srinivasa Rao, Vivek, Kolla, Kumar, Eedupalli Sai, Ammannamma, Tamminina·2022·2022 International Conference on Advanced Computing Technologies and Applications (ICACTA)

Abstract

Most all datasets that hold real-time data have an imbalanced organization of class instances. The total quantity of instances in certain classes is substantially greater than other classes and this skewed nature in the arrangement of classes is called Class Imbalance Problem (CIP). This imbalanced data affects the prediction performance since this forecast the weak class data samples wrongly. CIP is experienced by data mining professionals in a broad range of sectors. The categorization of imbalanced data is a huge challenge that arises in the discipline of Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL). It is the critical issue that emerged for research and the deployment of sampling strategies to enhance the performance of the classifier has attracted extensive interest in the literature review. In this study, the importance of organizing imbalanced data is explained and the techniques suggested by the different scholars to counterbalance the skewed nature of classes and the assessment criteria for measuring the accuracy and prediction rate of the different classifiers have indeed been examined.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/icacta54488.2022.9753392

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • During training, model performance was evaluated using 10-fold, 3-repeats stratified k-fold cross-validation and F2-score.

    “During training, model performance was evaluated using 10-fold, 3-repeats stratified k-fold cross-validation and F2-score (ie, instead of F1-score) as it penalizes false negatives.24,25”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 27 · Cited by 67

Authors
Basha, S. J., Madala, S. R., Vivek, K., Kumar, E. S., & Ammannamma, T.
Affiliations
  • Lakireddy Bali Reddy College of Engineering (A),Department of CSE,Mylavaram, Krishna Dt.,Andhra Pradesh,India,521230
  • PACE Institute of Technology and Sciences,Department of CSE,Ongole, Prakasam Dt.,Andhra Pradesh,India,523272
  • QIS Institute of Technology,Department of CSE,Ongole, Prakasam Dt.,Andhra Pradesh,India,523272
  • G. Narayanamma Institute of Technology & Science,Department of IT,Hyderabad,Telangana,India,500104
Venue
2022 International Conference on Advanced Computing Technologies and Applications (ICACTA)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2022-03-04
Pages
1-6
OpenAlex
W4223929858
Cited by
67
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 6
FWCI
8.02
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Conference on Advanced Computing Technologies and Applications (ICACTA) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Data Classification
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Data Stream Mining Techniques
Keywords
class imbalance, imbalanced classification, sampling strategy, minority class, classifier evaluation metrics, data mining, deep learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review