The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Exploring Directions and Strategies for Innovative AI Applications in Education——Based on the Survey of the Understanding and Attitudes of Economics and Management Majors Towards AI
Abstract
Using artificial intelligence to promote educational reform is an important proposition put forward by Xi General Secretary for college education reform, therefore, a thorough understanding of students' attitudes towards the application of AI in teaching is the breakthrough point for AI to assist college reform. This paper explores the perceived quality, perceived usefulness, attitude disposition, perceived risk, and intention to use five dimensions of attitude scales based on previous literature. Using software such as SPSS, the study analyzes the 552 student questionnaires collected, and the results show that students are familiar with AI, but their ability to innovate in its application is lacking. Furthermore, students generally hold a cautiously optimistic attitude towards the use of AI in educational teaching. Additionally, it was found that students from different grades and with different perceptual operation abilities have significantly different attitudes towards the application of AI in education and teaching. The research results provide certain reference value for the reform of college education and teaching with artificial intelligence in the future.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The ability to generate pol -ished AI-driven responses has also contributed to the increasing submission of work that students do not create, thus undermining the authenticity of assessments [ 68, 72, 85, 86].”
From Redefining student assessment in AI-infused learning environments: a systematic review of challenges and strategies for academic integrity (2026) · cites this paper as [86]
Citations
Cites
Thüs, D., Malone, S., & Brünken, R. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1474892 · Cited by 96
Research works printed but not linked: 17
- Jianfeng, 2021, Reform and Innovation of Higher Education in the Era of Artificial Intelligence[J], Education Management, 6, 18
- Pengfei, 2022, The Impact of Artificial Intelligence Technology on Education and Teaching[J], Modern Business Trade Industry, 21, 252
- Yaling, 2024, Digital Education Ecosystem: Evolution and Characteristics[J], Journal of Educational Development, 5
- Lele, 2023, Research on the Influencing Factors of the Innovative Diffusion of Artificial Intelligence in the Field of Education-Based on the TOE Theoretical Framework[J], Distance Education in China, 43, 54
- Yumeng, 2023, Intelligent Technology Drives the Transformation of Higher Education: Highlights and Reflections from the 2023 Horizon Report: Teaching and Learning Edition[J], Open Education Research, 29, 19
- Zhijun, 2024, Innovation in the Educational Application of International Generative Artificial Intelligence[J], Journal of Distance Education, 42, 65
- Hongyu, 2023, The Future Landscape, Potential Risks and Governance of Integrating Generative Artificial Intelligence into Higher Education[J], Modern Education Management, 11, 1
- Zhou, 2024, Generative Artificial Intelligence Empowering the Transformation of Educational Research Paradigms: Mechanisms, Risks and Countermeasures[J], China Educational Technology, 3, 68
- Jiyou, 2023, Artificial Intelligence and Education: Opportunities, Challenges and Countermeasures[J], Peking University Education Review, 21, 188
- Dunrong, 2024, Theoretical Explanation of the Application of AI Technology in University Education and Teaching[J], China University Teaching, 5, 4
- Ce, 2024, Metaverse Teaching: The Advanced Form of Digital Teaching Transformation in Higher Education[J], Computer Science, 51, 1
- Schneider, 2024, Use of Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education with Particular Reference to Automated Content Generation,Trust and Anxiety, Journal of Business and Educational Leadership, 141
- Yi, 2023, Research Hotspots, Similarities and Differences, and Development Enlightenment of “Artificial Intelligence + Education” at Home and Abroad [J], Tribune of Education Culture, 1, 81
- Hua, 2023, Application Potential, Risk Challenges and Coping Strategies of Generative AI in the Field of Education [J], Modern Education Management, 7, 66
- Yan, 2024, Current Situation and Reflection on the Application of Generative Artificial Intelligence among College Students-Based on a Survey of Zhejiang University [J], Open Education Research, 30, 89
- Zhe, 2018, Research on the Construction of an Influencing Factor Model for Teachers’ Information Technology Application Behavior [J], China Educational Technology, 118
- Liangfei, 2024, Clarification of the Connotation, Realistic Dilemma and Promotion Strategy of Mathematics Personalized Learning from the Perspective of Digital Intelligence [J], Journal of Educational Development, 28
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ncube, P. D. N., Dzvapatsva, G. P., Matobobo, C., & Ranga, M. M. (2026) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-025-00871-w · Cited by 31
“The ability to generate pol - ished AI-driven responses has also contributed to the increasing submission of work that students do not create, thus undermining the authenticity of assessments [ 68, 72, 85, 86].”
Metadata
- Authors
- Guo, B., Liu, Y., & Liu, J.
- Affiliations
- Wuhan University of Science and Technology (CN)
- ORCID
- Venue
- 2025 5th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Education (ICAIE)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2025-05-14
- Pages
- 65-74
- OpenAlex
- W4414433115
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 1.14
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Technology and Pedagogy
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Keywords
- artificial intelligence in education, student attitudes toward AI, economics and management majors, perceived usefulness, risk perception, intention to use, educational reform, university teaching, grade level differences
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Exploring Directions and Strategies for Innovative AI Applications in Education——Based on the Survey of the Understanding and Attitudes of Economics and Management Majors Towards AI. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/icaie64856.2025.11158588
- The paper
- Guo, B., Liu, Y., & Liu, J. (2025). Exploring Directions and Strategies for Innovative AI Applications in Education——Based on the Survey of the Understanding and Attitudes of Economics and Management Majors Towards AI. 2025 5th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Education (ICAIE). https://doi.org/10.1109/icaie64856.2025.11158588
