The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Variability of performance in video coding
Abstract
Modern video compression techniques exhibit variability of performance as a function of time. Studies are reported of viewer reactions to this variability, which indicates a sensitivity to particular features. Some interesting conclusions emerge for future work in video coding.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Furthermore, it is known that the subjective assessment of video quality is time-varying,14 and this temporal variation can strongly influence the overall quality ratings.15,16”
From ViS3: an algorithm for video quality assessment via analysis of spatial and spatiotemporal slices (2014) · cites this paper as [14]
Citations
Cites
Duration neglect in retrospective evaluations of affective episodes.
Fredrickson, B. L., & Kahneman, D. (1993) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.1.45 · Cited by 1,228
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- pearson, 1996, Selective Use of Model-based Coding for Large Moving Objects, Proc EUSIPCO 6th Eur Signal Process Conf
- jozawa, 1996, Video Coding using Adaptive Global MC and Local Affine MC, Proc EUSIPCO 6th Eur Signal Process Conf
- 10.1049/ip-vis:19951937 · DOI
- 10.1109/ICIP.1996.559637 · DOI
- 10.1109/5.387091 · DOI
- lodge, 1993, A method for the characterisation of low bit-rate picture quality
- ghanbari, 1988, variable bit rate transmission of television signals, Electronics Letters, 24, 392, 10.1049/el:19880265 · DOI
- aldridge, 1996, Subjective Assessment of Time-Varying Coding Distortions, Proc International Picture Coding Symposium, 269
- lodge, 1994, subjectively optimising low bit-rate television, Proceedings of 1994 International Broadcasting Convention - IBC 94, 333, 10.1049/cp:19940771 · DOI
- aldridge, 0, Evaluating Digital Television Picture Quality
- 1996, Introduction of a New Method for Single Stimulus Continuous Quality Evaluation (SSCQE)
- 10.1049/el:19890198 · DOI
- 10.1049/pi-b-2.1962.0207 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
ViS3: an algorithm for video quality assessment via analysis of spatial and spatiotemporal slices
Vu, P. V., & Chandler, D. M. (2014) · Journal of Electronic Imaging · doi:10.1117/1.jei.23.1.013016 · Cited by 185
“Δkðx; yÞ 1⁄4 1⁄2Ῡk ðx; yÞ α̂ðx;yÞ × 1⁄2Ῡk ðx; yÞ 1−α̂ðx;yÞ ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi 1þ Ῡk ðx; yÞ q : (14)”
Metadata
- Authors
- Pearson, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Essex (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Pearson, D.
- Venue
- 1997 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing
- Publisher
- IEEE Comput. Soc. Press
- Published
- 2002-11-22
- Volume
- 1
- Pages
- 5-8
- ISSN
- 1520-6149 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2097193532
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Video Quality Assessment
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Video Coding and Compression Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Data Compression Techniques
- Keywords
- video compression, performance variability, temporal variation, viewer perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
