The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Lattice-based optimization of sequence classification criteria for neural-network acoustic modeling
Abstract
Acoustic models used in hidden Markov model/neural-network (HMM/NN) speech recognition systems are usually trained with a frame-based cross-entropy error criterion. In contrast, Gaussian mixture HMM systems are discriminatively trained using sequence-based criteria, such as minimum phone error or maximum mutual information, that are more directly related to speech recognition accuracy. This paper demonstrates that neural-network acoustic models can be trained with sequence classification criteria using exactly the same lattice-based methods that have been developed for Gaussian mixture HMMs, and that using a sequence classification criterion in training leads to considerably better performance. A neural network acoustic model with 153K weights trained on 50 hours of broadcast news has a word error rate of 34.0% on the rt04 English broadcast news test set. When this model is trained with the state-level minimum Bayes risk criterion, the rt04 word error rate is 27.7%.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Maximum mutual information estimation of hidden Markov model parameters for speech recognition
Bahl, L., Brown, P., de Souza, P., & Mercer, R. (2005) · ICASSP '86. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp.1986.1169179 · Cited by 817
Cited by
Hinton, G., Deng, L., Yu, D., Dahl, G., Mohamed, A.-R., Jaitly, N., Senior, A., Vanhoucke, V., Nguyen, P., Sainath, T., et al. (2012) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2012.2205597 · Cited by 10,260
Self-citationDeep Learning: Methods and Applications
Deng, L. (2014) · now publishers, Inc. eBooks · doi:10.1561/9781601988157 · Cited by 1,759
Convolutional, Long Short-Term Memory, fully connected Deep Neural Networks
Sainath, T. N., Vinyals, O., Senior, A., & Sak, H. (2015) · 2015 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) · doi:10.1109/icassp.2015.7178838 · Cited by 1,678
Sequence-discriminative training of deep neural networks
Veselý, K., Ghoshal, A., Burget, L., & Povey, D. (2013) · Interspeech 2013 · doi:10.21437/interspeech.2013-548 · Cited by 657
Low-rank matrix factorization for Deep Neural Network training with high-dimensional output targets
Sainath, T. N., Kingsbury, B., Sindhwani, V., Arisoy, E., & Ramabhadran, B. (2013) · 2013 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp.2013.6638949 · Cited by 593
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Kingsbury, B.
- Venue
- 2009 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2009-04
- Pages
- 3761-3764
- ISSN
- 1520-6149 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2114016253
- Cited by
- 232
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.58
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lattice-based optimization of sequence classification criteria for neural-network acoustic modeling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/icassp.2009.4960445
- The paper
- Kingsbury, B. (2009). Lattice-based optimization of sequence classification criteria for neural-network acoustic modeling. 2009 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing. https://doi.org/10.1109/icassp.2009.4960445
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.