The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Learning a better representation of speech soundwaves using restricted boltzmann machines
Abstract
State of the art speech recognition systems rely on preprocessed speech features such as Mel cepstrum or linear predictive coding coefficients that collapse high dimensional speech sound waves into low dimensional encodings. While these have been successfully applied in speech recognition systems, such low dimensional encodings may lose some relevant information and express other information in a way that makes it difficult to use for discrimination. Higher dimensional encodings could both improve performance in recognition tasks, and also be applied to speech synthesis by better modeling the statistical structure of the sound waves. In this paper we present a novel approach for modeling speech sound waves using a Restricted Boltzmann machine (RBM) with a novel type of hidden variable and we report initial results demonstrating phoneme recognition performance better than the current state-of-the-art for methods based on Mel cepstrum coefficients.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
(2010) · International Conference on Machine Learning · Cited by 13,995
Self-citationAn Information-Maximization Approach to Blind Separation and Blind Deconvolution
Bell, A. J., & Sejnowski, T. J. (1995) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1995.7.6.1129 · Cited by 8,986
Training Products of Experts by Minimizing Contrastive Divergence
Hinton, G. E. (2002) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/089976602760128018 · Cited by 4,879 · cited 3×
“a weight parameter, wij ∈ W is as follows [6]:”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationA Practical Guide to Training Restricted Boltzmann Machines
Hinton, G. E. (2012) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-35289-8_32 · Cited by 2,852
Self-citationInformation processing in dynamical systems: foundations of harmony theory
Smolensky, P. (1986) · The MIT Press eBooks · Cited by 1,673
Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 19 (NIPS 2006)
Simonotto, E., Whalley, H. C., Lawrie, S. M., Murray, L. M., McGonigle, D. J., & Storkey, A. (2006) · Cited by 1,651
(2009) · neural information processing systems · Cited by 962
Efficient coding of natural sounds
Lewicki, M. S. (2002) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn831 · Cited by 697
An application of recurrent nets to phone probability estimation
Robinson, A. J. (1994) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks · doi:10.1109/72.279192 · Cited by 441
Phone Recognition with the Mean-Covariance Restricted Boltzmann Machine
Dahl, G. E., Ranzato, M., Mohamed, A., & Hinton, G. E. (2010) · Cited by 266
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Mohamed, Deep belief networks for phone recognition
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A survey of deep neural network architectures and their applications
Liu, W., Wang, Z., Liu, X., Zeng, N., Liu, Y., & Alsaadi, F. E. (2017) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2016.12.038 · Cited by 3,239
“During the past few decades, machine learning algorithms have been widely used in areas such as automatic speech recognition (ASR) and acoustic modeling [76,116,118,126].”
MethodZheng, W.-L., & Lu, B.-L. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Autonomous Mental Development · doi:10.1109/tamd.2015.2431497 · Cited by 2,477
“MLP, SVMs, CRFs) in many challenge tasks, especially in speech and image domains [29]–[31].”
BackgroundTowards End-To-End Speech Recognition with Recurrent Neural Networks
Graves, A., & Jaitly, N. (2014) · Cited by 1,861
Self-citationDeep Learning: Methods and Applications
Deng, L. (2014) · now publishers, Inc. eBooks · doi:10.1561/9781601988157 · Cited by 1,789
Improving deep neural networks for LVCSR using rectified linear units and dropout
Dahl, G. E., Sainath, T. N., & Hinton, G. E. (2013) · 2013 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp.2013.6639346 · Cited by 1,310
“the only use of these units in speech to date was in [10] where Gaussian-ReLU RBMs were used to learn features from raw, unlabeled acoustic data to later use in phone recognition experiments on TIMIT.”
MethodSelf-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Jaitly, N., & Hinton, G.
- Affiliations
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Venue
- 2011 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2011-05
- Pages
- 5884-5887
- ISSN
- 1520-6149 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2132037657
- Cited by
- 231
- References
- 19
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 9.01
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
- Keywords
- restricted Boltzmann machine, phoneme recognition, hidden variables, speech feature extraction, speech synthesis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review