Cited by 3,134Music and Audio ProcessingSpeech and Audio ProcessingSpeech Recognition and Synthesis

Audio Set: An ontology and human-labeled dataset for audio events

Gemmeke, Jort F., Ellis, Daniel P. W., Freedman, Dylan, Jansen, Aren, Lawrence, Wade, Moore, R. Channing, Plakal, Manoj, Ritter, Marvin·2017·2017 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP)

Abstract

Audio event recognition, the human-like ability to identify and relate sounds from audio, is a nascent problem in machine perception. Comparable problems such as object detection in images have reaped enormous benefits from comprehensive datasets - principally ImageNet. This paper describes the creation of Audio Set, a large-scale dataset of manually-annotated audio events that endeavors to bridge the gap in data availability between image and audio research. Using a carefully structured hierarchical ontology of 632 audio classes guided by the literature and manual curation, we collect data from human labelers to probe the presence of specific audio classes in 10 second segments of YouTube videos. Segments are proposed for labeling using searches based on metadata, context (e.g., links), and content analysis. The result is a dataset of unprecedented breadth and size that will, we hope, substantially stimulate the development of high-performance audio event recognizers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/icassp.2017.7952261

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Existing datasets for human vocal sounds have a relatively small number of vocal sound samples or noisy labels.

    “However, existing datasets have a relatively small number of vocal sound samples or noisy labels.”
  • AudioSet and FSD50K are class imbalanced and have a relatively small number of vocal sound samples.

    “While AudioSet and FSD50K consist of a large number of audio samples, they are class imbalanced and have a relatively small number of vocal sound samples”
  • AudioSet is the largest publicly available dataset for generic audio classification consisting of over 2 million audio clips.

    “AudioSet is currently the largest publicly available dataset for generic audio classification consisting of over 2 million audio clips”
  • AudioSet and FSD50K do not provide speaker information such as age, gender, native language, etc.

    “Also, limited by the data acquisition scheme, they do not provide speaker information such as age, gender, native language, etc.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 22 · Cited by 3,134

Authors
Gemmeke, J. F., Ellis, D. P. W., Freedman, D., Jansen, A., Lawrence, W., Moore, R. C., Plakal, M., & Ritter, M.
Affiliations
Google (United States) (US)
Venue
2017 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2017-03
Pages
776-780
ISSN
1520-6149 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2593116425
Cited by
3,134
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 282 · 2025: 507 · 2024: 456 · 2023: 460 · 2022: 408 · 2021: 414 · 2020: 279 · 2019: 195 · 2018: 102 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 1
FWCI
117.67
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Music and Audio Processing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
Keywords
sound recognition, audio classification, YouTube audio, audio segmentation, audio metadata

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review