Cited by 13Speech Recognition and SynthesisBiometric Identification and SecuritySpeech and Audio Processing

Phonespoof: A New Dataset for Spoofing Attack Detection in Telephone Channel

Lavrentyeva, Galina, Novoselov, Sergey, Volkova, Marina, Matveev, Yuri, De Marsico, Maria·2019·ICASSP 2019 - 2019 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP)

Abstract

The results of spoofing detection systems proposed during ASVspoof Challenges 2015 and 2017 confirmed the perspective in detection of unforseen spoofing trials in microphone channel. However, telephone channel presents much more challenging conditions for spoofing detection, due to limited bandwidth, various coding standards and channel effects. Research on the topic has thus far only made use of program codecs and other telephone channel emulations. Such emulations does not quite match the real telephone spoofing attacks. In order to asses spoofing detection methods in real scenario we present the PHONESPOOF dataset - spoofing data collected through realistic telephone channels. The PHONE-SPOOF data collection represents most threatening types of spoofing attacks and is publicly available dataset1. This work2aimed to investigate robustness of the state-of-the-art deep learning based antispoofing systems under telephone spoofing attacks conditions based on the PHONESPOOF data. Moreover newly collected dataset makes it possible to analize language dependency issue for the Anti-Spoofing methods. In the work we also focused on the development of a unified LCNN-based approach for spoofing attack detection. The goal was to train a single system able to detect various types of spoofing attacks in telephone channel. The obtained results approve the effectiveness of such solution.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/icassp.2019.8682942

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ideal clean conditions are unrealistic and other work has shown the likely degradation in countermeasure (CM) performance when deployed in practical scenarios such as person authentication over telephony channels.

    “Such ideal conditions are unrealistic and other work has shown the likely degradation in CM performance when they are deployed in practical scenarios such as person authentication over telephony channels [16], [17].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lavrentyeva, G., Novoselov, S., Volkova, M., Matveev, Y., & De Marsico, M.
Venue
ICASSP 2019 - 2019 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2019-05
Pages
2572-2576
ISSN
1520-6149 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2939306245
Cited by
13
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 2
FWCI
0.57
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Biometric Identification and Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
Keywords
anti-spoofing, telephone channel, voice spoofing, deep learning, ASVspoof, speaker verification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review