Phonespoof: A New Dataset for Spoofing Attack Detection in Telephone Channel
Abstract
The results of spoofing detection systems proposed during ASVspoof Challenges 2015 and 2017 confirmed the perspective in detection of unforseen spoofing trials in microphone channel. However, telephone channel presents much more challenging conditions for spoofing detection, due to limited bandwidth, various coding standards and channel effects. Research on the topic has thus far only made use of program codecs and other telephone channel emulations. Such emulations does not quite match the real telephone spoofing attacks. In order to asses spoofing detection methods in real scenario we present the PHONESPOOF dataset - spoofing data collected through realistic telephone channels. The PHONE-SPOOF data collection represents most threatening types of spoofing attacks and is publicly available dataset1. This work2aimed to investigate robustness of the state-of-the-art deep learning based antispoofing systems under telephone spoofing attacks conditions based on the PHONESPOOF data. Moreover newly collected dataset makes it possible to analize language dependency issue for the Anti-Spoofing methods. In the work we also focused on the development of a unified LCNN-based approach for spoofing attack detection. The goal was to train a single system able to detect various types of spoofing attacks in telephone channel. The obtained results approve the effectiveness of such solution.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Ideal clean conditions are unrealistic and other work has shown the likely degradation in countermeasure (CM) performance when deployed in practical scenarios such as person authentication over telephony channels.
“Such ideal conditions are unrealistic and other work has shown the likely degradation in CM performance when they are deployed in practical scenarios such as person authentication over telephony channels [16], [17].”
From ASVspoof 2021: Towards Spoofed and Deepfake Speech Detection in the Wild (2023) · cites this paper as [17]
Cites
Audio replay attack detection with deep learning frameworks
Lavrentyeva, G., Novoselov, S., Malykh, E., Kozlov, A., Kudashev, O., & Shchemelinin, V. (2017) · Interspeech 2017 · doi:10.21437/interspeech.2017-360 · Cited by 292 · see citing works
Self-citationImpact of Bandwidth and Channel Variation on Presentation Attack Detection for Speaker Verification
Delgado, H., Todisco, M., Evans, N., Sahidullah, M., Liu, W. M., Alegre, F., Kinnunen, T., & Fauve, B. (2017) · 2017 International Conference of the Biometrics Special Interest Group (BIOSIG) · doi:10.23919/biosig.2017.8053510 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
ASVspoof 2021: Towards Spoofed and Deepfake Speech Detection in the Wild
Liu, X., Wang, X., Sahidullah, M., Patino, J., Delgado, H., Kinnunen, T., Todisco, M., Yamagishi, J., Evans, N., Nautsch, A., et al. (2023) · IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing · doi:10.1109/taslp.2023.3285283 · Cited by 312 · see citing works
“Such ideal conditions are unrealistic and other work has shown the likely degradation in CM performance when they are deployed in practical scenarios such as person authentication over telephony channels [16], [17].”
Background
- Authors
- Lavrentyeva, G., Novoselov, S., Volkova, M., Matveev, Y., & De Marsico, M.
- Venue
- ICASSP 2019 - 2019 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2019-05
- Pages
- 2572-2576
- ISSN
- 1520-6149 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2939306245
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 0.57
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing (publishedVersion)
- IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Biometric Identification and Security
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
- Keywords
- anti-spoofing, telephone channel, voice spoofing, deep learning, ASVspoof, speaker verification
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review