Cited by 83Emotion and Mood RecognitionSpeech Recognition and SynthesisSpeech and Audio Processing

Revisiting Hidden Markov Models for Speech Emotion Recognition

Mao, Shuiyang, Tao, Dehua, Zhang, Guangyan, Ching, P. C., Lee, Tan·2019·ICASSP 2019 - 2019 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP)

Abstract

Hidden Markov models (HMMs) have a long tradition in automatic speech recognition (ASR) due to their capability of capturing temporal dynamic characteristics of speech. For emotion recognition from speech, three HMM based architectures are investigated and compared throughout the current paper, namely, the Gaussian mixture model based HMMs (GMM-HMMs), the subspace based Gaussian mixture model based HMMs (SGMM-HMMs) and the hybrid deep neural network HMMs (DNN-HMMs). Extensive emotion recognition experiments are carried out on these three architectures on the CASIA corpus, the Emo-DB corpus and the IEMOCAP database, respectively, and results are compared with those of state-of-the-art approaches. These HMM based architectures prove capable of constituting an effective model for speech emotion recognition. Also, the modeling accuracy is further enhanced by incorporating various advanced techniques from the ASR area. In particular, among all of the architectures, the SGMM-HMMs achieve the best performance in most of the experiments.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/icassp.2019.8683172

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The proposed model outperforms state-of-the-art unimodal SER models by at least 6.8% in mean weighted accuracy and 5.9% in mean unweighted accuracy (abstract: about 6% improvement).

    “It also outperforms state-of-the-art unimodal SER models [18, 19, 6] by at least 6.8% in mean weighted accuracy and 5.9% in mean unweighted accuracy.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 28 · Cited by 83

Authors
Mao, S., Tao, D., Zhang, G., Ching, P. C., & Lee, T.
Affiliations
Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
Venue
ICASSP 2019 - 2019 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2019-05
Pages
6715-6719
ISSN
1520-6149 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2939488497
Cited by
83
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 2
FWCI
12.91
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
Keywords
speech emotion recognition, hidden Markov models, IEMOCAP

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review