Revisiting Hidden Markov Models for Speech Emotion Recognition
Abstract
Hidden Markov models (HMMs) have a long tradition in automatic speech recognition (ASR) due to their capability of capturing temporal dynamic characteristics of speech. For emotion recognition from speech, three HMM based architectures are investigated and compared throughout the current paper, namely, the Gaussian mixture model based HMMs (GMM-HMMs), the subspace based Gaussian mixture model based HMMs (SGMM-HMMs) and the hybrid deep neural network HMMs (DNN-HMMs). Extensive emotion recognition experiments are carried out on these three architectures on the CASIA corpus, the Emo-DB corpus and the IEMOCAP database, respectively, and results are compared with those of state-of-the-art approaches. These HMM based architectures prove capable of constituting an effective model for speech emotion recognition. Also, the modeling accuracy is further enhanced by incorporating various advanced techniques from the ASR area. In particular, among all of the architectures, the SGMM-HMMs achieve the best performance in most of the experiments.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The proposed model outperforms state-of-the-art unimodal SER models by at least 6.8% in mean weighted accuracy and 5.9% in mean unweighted accuracy (abstract: about 6% improvement).
“It also outperforms state-of-the-art unimodal SER models [18, 19, 6] by at least 6.8% in mean weighted accuracy and 5.9% in mean unweighted accuracy.”
From Speech Emotion Recognition with Dual-Sequence LSTM Architecture (2020) · cites this paper as [19]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 28 · Cited by 83
- Authors
- Mao, S., Tao, D., Zhang, G., Ching, P. C., & Lee, T.
- Affiliations
- Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
- Venue
- ICASSP 2019 - 2019 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2019-05
- Pages
- 6715-6719
- ISSN
- 1520-6149 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2939488497
- Cited by
- 83
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 12.91
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
- Keywords
- speech emotion recognition, hidden Markov models, IEMOCAP
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review