Test-Time Detection of Backdoor Triggers for Poisoned Deep Neural Networks
Abstract
Backdoor (Trojan) attacks are emerging threats against deep neural networks (DNN). A DNN being attacked will predict to an attacker-desired target class whenever a test sample from any source class is embedded with a backdoor pattern, while correctly classifying clean (attack-free) test samples. Existing backdoor defenses have shown success in detecting whether a DNN is attacked and in reverse-engineering the backdoor pattern in a "post-training" scenario: the defender has access to the DNN to be inspected and a small, clean dataset collected independently, but has no access to the (possibly poisoned) training set of the DNN. However, these defenses neither catch culprits in the act of triggering the backdoor mapping, nor mitigate the backdoor attack at test-time. In this paper, we propose an "in-flight" unsupervised defense against backdoor attacks on image classification that 1) detects use of a backdoor trigger at test-time; and 2) infers the class of origin (source class) for a detected trigger example. The effectiveness of our defense is demonstrated experimentally for a wide variety of DNN architectures, datasets, and backdoor attack configurations.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
ARIBA can defend against multiple types of backdoor attacks with properly trained weight filters without degrading benign performance.
“The proposed method can defend against multiple types of backdoor attacks with properly trained weight filters without degrading the benign performance.”
From Data and model poisoning backdoor attacks on wireless federated learning, and the defense mechanisms: A comprehensive survey (2024) · cites this paper as [222]
Unsupervised anomaly detection methods [220] and [222] are incompatible with the SecAgg protocol, so data privacy and security can hardly be ensured.
“The unsupervised anomaly detection methods proposed in [220] and [222] are incompatible with the SecAgg protocol. Thus, data privacy and security can hardly be ensured.”
From Data and model poisoning backdoor attacks on wireless federated learning, and the defense mechanisms: A comprehensive survey (2024) · cites this paper as [222]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 27 · Cited by 11
- Authors
- Li, X., Xiang, Z., Miller, D. J., & Kesidis, G.
- Affiliations
- Pennsylvania State University (US)
- Venue
- ICASSP 2022 - 2022 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2022-05-23
- Pages
- 3333-3337
- ISSN
- 1520-6149 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4225911886
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 1.24
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Security and Verification in Computing
- Keywords
- backdoor attacks, image classification, data poisoning, deep neural network
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review