Cited by 330Music and Audio ProcessingDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningSpeech Recognition and Synthesis

Audioclip: Extending Clip to Image, Text and Audio

Guzhov, Andrey, Raue, Federico, Hees, Jorn, Dengel, Andreas·2022·ICASSP 2022 - 2022 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP)

Abstract

The rapidly evolving field of sound classification has greatly benefited from the methods of other domains. Today, the trend is to fuse domain-specific tasks and approaches together, which provides the community with new outstanding models.We present AudioCLIP – an extension of the CLIP model that handles audio in addition to text and images. Utilizing the AudioSet dataset, our proposed model incorporates the ESResNeXt audio-model into the CLIP framework, thus enabling it to perform multimodal classification and keeping CLIP’s zero-shot capabilities.AudioCLIP achieves new state-of-the-art results in the Environmental Sound Classification (ESC) task and out-performs others by reaching accuracies of 97.15 % on ESC-50 and 90.07 % on UrbanSound8K. Further, it sets new baselines in the zero-shot ESC-task on the same datasets (69.40 % and 68.78 %, respectively).We also asses the influence of different training setups on the final performance of the proposed model. For the sake of reproducibility, our code is published.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/icassp43922.2022.9747631

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • LTU-AS directly outputs predictions in natural language.

    “Compared with CLIP-like models [48,47], LTU-AS does not require any pre-defined label set and directly outputs predictions in natural language”

    From Joint Audio and Speech Understanding (2023) · cites this paper as [47]

  • LTU-AS does not require any pre-defined label set.

    “Compared with CLIP-like models [48,47], LTU-AS does not require any pre-defined label set and directly outputs predictions in natural language”

    From Joint Audio and Speech Understanding (2023) · cites this paper as [47]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Guzhov, A., Raue, F., Hees, J., & Dengel, A.
Affiliations
German Research Centre for Artificial Intelligence (DE)
Venue
ICASSP 2022 - 2022 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2022-05-23
Pages
976-980
ISSN
1520-6149 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3176445421
Cited by
330
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 55 · 2025: 106 · 2024: 93 · 2023: 57 · 2022: 19
FWCI
48.89
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Music and Audio Processing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
Keywords
CLIP, audio classification, environmental sound classification, zero-shot learning, multimodal classification, AudioSet, UrbanSound8K, ESC-50

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review