Cited by 468Gait Recognition and AnalysisBiometric Identification and SecurityFace recognition and analysis

GEINet: View-invariant gait recognition using a convolutional neural network

Shiraga, Kohei, Makihara, Yasushi, Muramatsu, Daigo, Echigo, Tomio, Yagi, Yasushi·2016·2016 International Conference on Biometrics (ICB)

Abstract

This paper proposes a method of gait recognition using a convolutional neural network (CNN). Inspired by the great successes of CNNs in image recognition tasks, we feed in the most prevalent image-based gait representation, that is, the gait energy image (GEI), as an input to a CNN designed for gait recognition called GEINet. More specifically, GEINet is composed of two sequential triplets of convolution, pooling, and normalization layers, and two subsequent fully connected layers, which output a set of similarities to individual training subjects. We conducted experiments to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method in terms of cross-view gait recognition in both cooperative and uncooperative settings using the OU-ISIR large population dataset. As a result, we confirmed that the proposed method significantly outperformed state-of-the-art approaches, in particular in verification scenarios.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/icb.2016.7550060

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Shiraga et al. used an architecture similar to LeNet to create a GEI-based recognizer, achieving 91.5% accuracy on the OU-ISIR Large Population dataset.

    “In the context of gait recognition, Shiraga et al. [86] used an architecture similar to LENet [49] to create a gleaming-based recognizer through Gait Energy Image (GEI). The model achieved an accuracy of 91 . 5% in the OU-ISIR [59] Large Population dataset.”

    From Gait Recognition Based on Deep Learning: A Survey (2023) · cites this paper as [86]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 45 · Cited by 468

Authors
Shiraga, K., Makihara, Y., Muramatsu, D., Echigo, T., & Yagi, Y.
Affiliations
  • The Institute of Scientific and Industrial Research, The University of Osaka (JP)
  • Osaka Electro-Communication University (JP)
  • The University of Osaka (JP)
Venue
2016 International Conference on Biometrics (ICB)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2016-06
Pages
1-8
OpenAlex
W2510190030
Cited by
468
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 76 · 2023: 74 · 2022: 62 · 2021: 66 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
59.41
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Conference on Biometrics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Gait Recognition and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Biometric Identification and Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
Keywords
gait recognition, view-invariant recognition, gait energy image, convolutional neural networks, cross-view gait recognition, biometric authentication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review