The DOI matches its Crossref record.
38 GHz and 60 GHz angle-dependent propagation for cellular & peer-to-peer wireless communications
Abstract
As the cost of massively broadband® semiconductors continue to be driven down at millimeter wave (mm-wave) frequencies, there is great potential to use LMDS spectrum (in the 28-38 GHz bands) and the 60 GHz band for cellular/mobile and peer-to-peer wireless networks. This work presents urban cellular and peer-to-peer RF wideband channel measurements using a broadband sliding correlator channel sounder and steerable antennas at carrier frequencies of 38 GHz and 60 GHz, and presents measurements showing the propagation time delay spread and path loss as a function of separation distance and antenna pointing angles for many types of real-world environments. The data presented here show that at 38 GHz, unobstructed Line of Site (LOS) channels obey free space propagation path loss while non-LOS (NLOS) channels have large multipath delay spreads and can exploit many different pointing angles to provide propagation links. At 60 GHz, there is notably more path loss, smaller delay spreads, and fewer unique antenna angles for creating a link. For both 38 GHz and 60 GHz, we demonstrate empirical relationships between the RMS delay spread and antenna pointing angles, and observe that excess path loss (above free space) has an inverse relationship with transmitter-to-receiver separation distance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Next generation 5G wireless networks: a comprehensive survey
Agiwal, M., Roy, A., & Saxena, N. (2016) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2016.2532458 · Cited by 3,444
A Survey of 5G Network: Architecture and Emerging Technologies
Gupta, A., & Jha, R. K. (2015) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2015.2461602 · Cited by 2,420
A Survey on Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access for 5G Networks: Research Challenges and Future Trends
Ding, Z., Lei, X., Karagiannidis, G. K., Schober, R., Yuan, J., & Bhargava, V. K. (2017) · IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications · doi:10.1109/jsac.2017.2725519 · Cited by 2,392
A Comprehensive Survey on Internet of Things (IoT) Toward 5G Wireless Systems
Chettri, L., & Bera, R. (2020) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2019.2948888 · Cited by 1,737
Millimeter Wave Communications for Future Mobile Networks
Xiao, M., Mumtaz, S., Huang, Y., Dai, L., Li, Y., Matthaiou, M., Karagiannidis, G. K., Bjornson, E., Yang, K., I, C.-L., et al. (2017) · IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications · doi:10.1109/jsac.2017.2719924 · Cited by 1,122
Metadata
- Authors
- Rappaport, T. S., Ben-Dor, E., Murdock, J. N., & Qiao, Y.
- Venue
- 2012 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2012-06
- Pages
- 4568-4573
- ISSN
- 1550-3607 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2142165404
- Cited by
- 368
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 38.89
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: 38 GHz and 60 GHz angle-dependent propagation for cellular & peer-to-peer wireless communications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/icc.2012.6363891
- The paper
- Rappaport, T. S., Ben-Dor, E., Murdock, J. N., & Qiao, Y. (2012). 38 GHz and 60 GHz angle-dependent propagation for cellular & peer-to-peer wireless communications. 2012 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC). https://doi.org/10.1109/icc.2012.6363891
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.