Cited by 29Advanced Memory and Neural ComputingNeural Networks and ApplicationsNeural Networks and Reservoir Computing

Memristor-based perceptron classifier: Increasing complexity and coping with imperfect hardware

Bayat, Farnood Merrikh, Prezioso, Mirko, Chakrabarti, Bhaswar, Kataeva, Irina, Strukov, Dmitri·2017·2017 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Computer-Aided Design (ICCAD)

Abstract

We experimentally demonstrate classification of 4×4 binary images into 4 classes, using a 3-layer mixed-signal neuromorphic network (“MLP perceptron”), based on two passive 20×20 memristive crossbar arrays, board-integrated with discrete CMOS components. The network features 10 hidden-layer and 4 output-layer analog CMOS neurons and 428 metal-oxide memristors, i.e. is almost an order of magnitude more complex than any previously reported functional passive (0T1R) memristor classifier. Moreover, the inference operation of this classifier is performed entirely in the integrated hardware. To deal with larger crossbar arrays, we have developed a semiautomatic approach to their forming and testing, and compared several memristor training schemes for coping with imperfect behavior of these devices, as well as with variability of analog CMOS neurons. The effectiveness of the proposed schemes for defect and variation tolerance was verified experimentally using the implemented network and, additionally, by modeling the operation of a larger network, with 300 hidden-layer neurons, on the MNIST benchmark. Finally, we propose a simple modification of the implemented memristor-based vector-by-matrix multiplier to allow its operation in a wider temperature range.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/iccad.2017.8203825

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bayat, F. M., Prezioso, M., Chakrabarti, B., Kataeva, I., & Strukov, D.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
  • Denso (Japan) (JP)
Venue
2017 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Computer-Aided Design (ICCAD)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2017-11
Pages
549-554
OpenAlex
W4241904915
Cited by
29
References
3
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3
FWCI
5.03
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Funders
DENSO
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Memory and Neural Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Reservoir Computing
Keywords
memristors, perceptron, neuromorphic hardware, memristor crossbar, metal-oxide memristors, device variability, temperature stability, MNIST classification, binary image classification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review