Pixel Level Image Encryption Based on Semantic Segmentation
Abstract
Nowadays, a large amount of image information is transmitting on the internet, and people are focusing more on image security. These years, encryption algorithm based on “scrambling-diffusion” architecture has made great achievement in security performance. Nevertheless, there is no need to encrypt the full image. Only part of it matters, which is defined as Region of Interested (ROI). In this paper, we propose a pixel-level image encryption method based on semantic segmentation. We use a PSPNet model trained on Cityscapes dataset to gain the coordinate of each pixels in ROI, then we encrypt these coordinates with a novel chaotic encryption system we proposed. In this system, we improved the scrambling-diffusion architecture. Scrambling and diffusion share the chaotic sequence iterated by the four-dimensional hyperchaotic Chen system, and generate the required key flows independently. Our encryption system acts well in the test, almost all the coordinates of ROI are covered. Cryptanalysis shows its superior security.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Shan [197] used the PSPNet model to obtain portrait information and introduced a new chaotic image-encryption algorithm using an upgraded perturbation-diffusion architecture; experimental results indicated good security performance.
“The experimental results indicated that this algorithm demonstrated good security performance.”
From Chaos-Based Image Encryption: Review, Application, and Challenges (2023) · cites this paper as [197]
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474 · see citing works
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155 · see citing works
Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks
Ren, S., He, K., Girshick, R., & Sun, J. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2016.2577031 · Cited by 56,035 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Chaos-Based Image Encryption: Review, Application, and Challenges
Zhang, B., & Liu, L. (2023) · Mathematics · doi:10.3390/math11112585 · Cited by 328 · see citing works
“Thus, the selective encryption of image content is a relatively new and promising research direction [195–197].”
BackgroundMethod
- Authors
- Shan, Y., He, M., Yu, Z., & Wu, H.
- Affiliations
- Northeastern University (CN)
- ORCID
- Yu, Ziyuan
- Venue
- 2018 International Conference on Control, Artificial Intelligence, Robotics & Optimization (ICCAIRO)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2018-05
- Pages
- 147-152
- OpenAlex
- W2941182711
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 0.15
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Conference on Control, Artificial Intelligence, Robotics & Optimization (ICCAIRO) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Chaos-based Image/Signal Encryption
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Computer Science and Engineering
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptographic Implementations and Security
- Keywords
- semantic segmentation, chaos-based cryptography, hyperchaotic Chen system, image security, cryptanalysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review