Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Efficient Authorship Attribution Method Using Ensemble Models Built by Knowledge Distillation

Sakurai, Wataru, Asano, Masato, Imoto, Daisuke, Honma, Masakatsu, Kurosawa, Kenji·2023·2023 9th International Conference on Computer and Communications (ICCC)

Abstract

Authorship attribution is a task to identify the author of given documents. It is often treated as a classification task that predicts the author of a written text among given candidates. From practical application perspectives, such as forensic science, the interpretation of results is essential, and the ability to perform authorship attribution with many sentences at high speed will become increasingly important for developing authorship attribution methods. Recently, transformer-based large-scale language models have been developed in natural language processing, and high accuracy has been achieved in various fields. The attention mechanism implemented in the encoder part of the transformer is called self-attention, which calculates the degree of attention given to each word in a sentence. However, in classification problems such as author attribution, the only evidence used as a basis for judgment is the attention distribution, which is a single dimension of the matrix calculated by self-attention and is computationally inefficient. In addition, since this attention distribution is obtained for the number of attentions in the model, its contribution to estimation results and utilization is difficult to examine. In this study, we propose an authorship attribution method that ensembles compact models that substitute each attention of a fine-tuned transformer made by knowledge distillation. We also examine the contribution of each attention to the estimation results based on…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/iccc59590.2023.10507584

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Matsuura, 2000, Authorship detection of sentences by 8 japanese modern authors via n-gram distribution, SIG Technical Reports(NL), 53, 1
  2. 10.1145/3184558.3191621 · DOI
  3. Shirai, Author estimation using latent dirichlet allocation, 2
  4. Smith, 2014, Determining if two documents are written by the same author, Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65, 178, 10.1002/asi.22954 · DOI
  5. 10.48550/ARXIV.1706.03762 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Fabien, BertAA : BERT fine-tuning for authorship attribution, 127
  7. Hinton, Distilling the knowledge in a neural network
  8. 10.1038/s41598-022-13690-4 · DOI
  9. Zagoruyko, Paying more attention to attention: Improving the performance of convolutional neural networks via attention transfer
  10. Maekawa, 2008, Compilation of the kotonoha-bccwj corpus, The Society of Japanese Linguistics, 4, 82
  11. Loshchilov, Decoupled weight decay regularization
  12. 10.1145/3546000.3546007 · DOI
  13. 10.14778/3415478.3415530 · DOI
  14. Mosbach, On the interplay between fine-tuning and sentence-level probing for linguistic knowledge in pre-trained transformers, 68
  15. Zhou, 2022, A closer look at how fine-tuning changes BERT, 1046, 10.18653/v1/2022.acl-long.75 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Sakurai, W., Asano, M., Imoto, D., Honma, M., & Kurosawa, K.
Affiliations
  • National Research Institute of Police Science,Artificial Intelligence Section,Kashiwa-shi,Japan
  • National Research Institute of Police Science,Second Department of Forensic Science,Kashiwa-shi,Japan
Venue
2023 9th International Conference on Computer and Communications (ICCC)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2023-12-08
Pages
2357-2362
Cited by
1
References
3

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.